China and US Trade Talks: A Solution for Oil Shortages?

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The war with Iran is not going well. It is difficult to supply US troops with adequate food and other necessities. With summer arriving soon, the region will soon be an even more inhospitable place for ground troops to fight. An underlying problem is that the world economy was reaching resource limits even before the Iran War began, adding to the difficulties.

The most pressing resource limit is distillate fuel oil–an industry term for what we think of as diesel and jet fuel. This fuel is heavily used in transportation. It is also used extensively in agriculture and industry. Somehow, the system needs to cut back on these fuels for international trade so that more fuel is available for agriculture and industry.

President Trump of the US and President Xi of China will be meeting in Beijing on May 14-15. This meeting would seem to be the perfect time to start reorganizing the world with shorter trade routes, so that the world economy uses less fuel for transportation. China and the US are the two great powers in the world. Keeping trade mostly within the two areas shown in Figure 1 would be a way of using fuel oil more sparingly.

A simplified world map highlighting two regions in yellow: one in North America and one in East Asia.
Figure 1. Map of the world showing how Gail Tverberg expects Presidents Xi and Trump might split most world trade. The vast majority of trade would take place within the two areas shown. Within these groupings, the centers of trade might be the yellow areas shown.

An advantage of such a plan, besides saving on fuel, is that it could stop the Iran War without clearly declaring one side the winner or loser. In this post, I will attempt to explain the situation further.

[1] Based on the ideas of Dr. Mohammed Marandi, I believe that China might be able to mediate a settlement between the US and Iran.

Dr. Marandi was born in the United States of Iranian parents. He currently lives in Iran, where he is a professor at the University of Tehran. In the video, One Country Quietly Won this War, he points out that, often, when two countries battle each other, neither one emerges as the clear winner. Both of them are damaged by the war. The actual winner may be a country that does not seem to be directly involved in the war.

In the video referenced above, Dr. Marandi discusses three historical situations in which a nation not directly involved in a conflict gained stature by being the “adult in the room,” when two other nations battled each other. In this case, Dr. Marandi believes that China could very well be the country that can exert enough pressure on both sides to get them to accept a proposed solution. He says that China has acted behind the scenes to bring about the ceasefire, and that Trump has acknowledged China’s role.

Dr. Marandi suggests the idea that the upcoming meeting of the two presidents might be an opportune moment to make major steps toward a mutually agreed settlement. I believe that the underlying problem is that there isn’t enough energy (particularly oil) to support a world population of over eight billion. Dividing up markets in the way I have suggested would at least somewhat alleviate the shortage. Of course, there may be other terms of a settlement, as well. In addition, not all the terms may be determined precisely at this time.

[2] The world doesn’t have enough diesel and jet fuel to maintain the current level of trade across the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

Line graph showing world per capita diesel and jet fuel consumption from 1980 to 2024, indicating a small peak in 2007 and a major drop in 2020 with only partial recovery afterward.
Figure 2. Combined diesel and jet fuel supply, divided by world population, based on data of the 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy, published by the Energy Institute.

Figure 2 shows that per capita diesel and jet fuel started to drop at the time of the Great Financial Crisis in 2007-2009. Their supply took a larger step down in 2020, and it hasn’t completely recovered. In 2026, the Iran War has taken out more crude oil supply, for an unknown period of time.

Diesel and jet fuel are both very important as transportation fuels. Diesel is also important in agriculture because it provides the power needed for heavy machinery to till fields, even under the most adverse conditions. Diesel provides the power needed for large commercial trucks, many trains, and ships. Earth moving equipment is also typically operated by diesel fuel.

If the amount of trade across the Atlantic and Pacific could be greatly reduced, it would help alleviate the shortage of distillates. Of course, the tourist trade would also need to be greatly reduced. With recent spikes in aviation fuel prices, many flights are being cut. Some airlines, including Spirit Airlines in the US, are going bankrupt. The problem is starting to solve itself, but more changes will be needed.

[3] Looking at population and oil supplies, the Americas seems likely to come out somewhat ahead.

[3a] Comparing the populations of the two areas, the World ex Americas is much larger, and its population is growing faster.

Line graph depicting global population growth from 1980 to 2024, comparing populations in the Americas (blue line) and the world excluding the Americas (orange line).
Figure 3. World population between the Americas and the world excluding the Americas, based on data of the 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy, published by the Energy Institute.

President Xi (leading one hemisphere) would get the very large and still rapidly growing part of the world population. President Trump would get a smaller and less rapidly growing share of the world population. Between 2021 and 2024, world population grew an average of 0.6% per year in the Americas, and an average of 0.9% per year in the World ex Americas.

[3b] The Americas seem to have an advantage with respect to crude oil production.

Line graph depicting crude oil production per capita from 1980 to projected 2025, showing two lines: one for the Americas (blue) and another for the world excluding the Americas (orange).
Figure 4. Crude oil production per capita, based on data of the US Energy Information Administration.

It makes sense to look at energy amounts on a per-capita basis because the quantity needed depends on the number of people requiring the benefits of transportation, agriculture, and industry. On this basis, crude oil production of the Americas has clearly been outshining that of the World ex Americas. It is higher on a per-capita basis. In addition, the amount available has been increasing in recent years.

Figure 5, below, shows total crude oil production (not per capita).

Line graph showing crude oil production from 1980 to 2025, with two lines: one representing 'Americas' in blue, and another representing 'World ex Americas' in orange. The y-axis measures production in million barrels per day.
Figure 5. Crude oil production of the Americas compared to that of the World ex Americas, based on data of the US Energy Information Administration.

Figure 5 suggests that since 2005, crude oil production for the World ex Americas has hardly increased. In fact, total extraction has decreased since 2019. A person viewing this data might conclude that crude oil production in this area may already be past its peak.

On the other hand, Figure 5 shows that oil production of the Americas has increased by about 65% since 2005. Many people believe that US shale production will soon decline. At the same time, however, increases seem likely in several other countries in the Americas, including Canada, Brazil, Argentina, and Guyana. Thus, while crude oil production for the Americas may decline in the near future, its decline is likely to be gradual.

[3c] Crude oil production by geographical area outside of the Americas shows declining production in all areas.

Line graph showing crude oil production by area, excluding the Americas, from 1980 to 2025. The graph features multiple colored lines representing Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa, Russia+, and the Middle East, with production in million barrels per day.
Figure 6. Crude oil production by geographical area for the World ex Americas, based on data from the US Energy Information Administration. Russia+ refers to Russia plus nearby countries that used to be part of the Soviet Union.

Figure 6 shows that Europe’s crude oil production started its permanent decline in 2001. Asia-Pacific’s production hit a maximum in 2010, and it has been declining since. Africa’s peak oil production took place in 2008, and it has been mostly declining since.

Russia+, which I use to refer to Russia plus nearby countries that used to be part of the Soviet Union, has an unusual production pattern. Its crude oil production started to decline in 1989, two years before the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. (This collapse in crude oil production likely contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union.) Crude oil production for Russia+ rose from 1998 to 2019.

Russia+’s production took a big step down in 2020, and it has not been able to recover since. A person might think that Russia+’s oil production was post peak, even before the 2022 conflict with Ukraine broke out. If an oil exporter doesn’t have enough oil to export, it tends to create financial problems within an economy. Participating in a war can appear to mitigate the country’s problems.

Many people assume that the Middle East has endless inexpensive-to-produce crude oil. I don’t think that this is the case. Crude oil production of the Middle East (Figure 6 above) hit two similar peaks in 2016 and 2018, and it has been lower in years since then. I think that Middle Eastern oil production is likely past peak partly because of depletion issues and partly because most countries in the area require high taxes on oil exports to provide subsidies for their ever-growing populations. This leads OPEC to try to maintain high prices. Lower crude oil production since 2018 is consistent with the hypothesis that oil production for the Middle East is mostly post-peak.

One additional difficulty of the World ex Americas is that it is so heavily populated that it cannot access tight oil that might be available without displacing a large number of residents. Another difficulty is that very old wells, such as those in Saudi Arabia and Iran, are ones that it might not be possible to restart if they are shut in for an extended time.

[4] In terms of mining and manufacturing, the Americas seems to come out behind the World ex Americas.

The World ex Americas has rapidly ramped up mining and manufacturing. Coal has been the preferred industrial fuel, with natural gas consumption also increasing.

Line graph depicting global energy consumption by type (Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Fossil Fuel Extenders) from 1980 to 2022, measured in Exajoules.
Figure 7. Energy consumption by type for World ex Americas, based on data of the 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy, based on data of the Energy Institute. Fossil fuel extenders include hydroelectric power, nuclear power, wind power, solar power, biofuels including ethanol, and any other types of add-ons to fossil fuels.

Figure 7 shows that the energy consumption of the World ex Americas started increasing more rapidly after China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001. The consumption of coal and natural gas has especially increased.

Line graph displaying energy consumption by type in the Americas from 1980 to 2022, showing oil, coal, natural gas, and fossil fuel extenders in exajoules.
Figure 8. Energy consumption by type for the Americas, based on data of the 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy, based on data of the Energy Institute.

The economies of the Americas have tended to shift towards service economies. Emphasis has been placed on fuel efficiency. Homes are now better insulated, light bulbs are more efficient, and engines of vehicles are more efficient. As a result, energy consumption within the Americas has tended to stay flat (Figure 8).

I have used the same scale on Figure 8 as on Figure 7 to emphasize how low energy consumption for the Americas is now, relative to the rest of the world. After US oil prices first rose to a high level in 1973, the US started transferring manufacturing to lower-wage countries. Southeast Asian countries began to be favored after 2001. Moving manufacturing abroad helped hold down US energy consumption and helped make the cost of goods to the consumer cheaper.

The problem today is that moving so much manufacturing elsewhere has made it difficult for the Americas to go back to producing its own goods, including clothing, furniture, and transformers for electrical systems. Supply lines for a particular item, such as a refrigerator, often run through many countries around the world.

[5] The full transition to the configuration shown on Figure 1 could take well over 100 years.

Changes, such as new supply lines and the new placement of major population areas, cannot happen very quickly. But I expect that some of the same underlying principles that guided these decisions in the past will continue to guide them in the future.

For example, infrastructure (roads, bridges, pipelines, and (today) long distance electricity transmission lines) seems to be the most difficult part of an economy to maintain because of the huge amount of energy required. Before the days of fossil fuels, I understand that slave labor was often used to build and maintain infrastructure. Similarly, slave labor was sometimes used to staff the mines needed to support the building of such infrastructure. As we lose fossil fuels, we will need to think about reducing our reliance on infrastructure.

One low-infrastructure approach used in the past was to build cities near bodies of water, so that fewer roads would be needed. Boats could be used to transport goods without building roads or bridges. If fish were available, they could be caught and used for food. In Figure 1, I am imagining that we will head back in this direction, with cities especially along navigable bodies of water and the ocean.

Unless we discover ways to replace fossil fuel energy, I would expect that the system will tend to go down in the reverse order of when it was put up. In general, electricity was last to be added, after coal, oil, and gas from coal. Electrification was first built in cities; then electricity transmission lines were added to provide electricity to rural areas. Above-ground lines tend to be damaged in storms, leading to a need for frequent repairs. Because of this issue, I would expect rural electricity to disappear quite quickly, unless it is generated at the location where it is used.

Natural gas shipped as Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) was added very late. Its cost tends to be much higher than that of pipeline gas. I expect it to disappear quite quickly.

A full transition to the two trading zones shown on Figure 1 would require a huge number of changes in supply lines. A 2025 chart by Visual Capitalist shows how much control China has over critical minerals. It states, “China controls key materials such as graphite, rare earths, and gallium–essential for green technologies and defense industries.” While the US has started working on its own production of minerals, it will also need to develop the processing capability for these minerals. Putting all of this in place will likely take many decades. This is a significant factor in the 100-year estimate.

[6] If energy supplies are limited, I would expect population centers closest to fuel sources to be especially favored.

Writers today talk about possibly running short of diesel and jet fuel in a few weeks or months. Clearly, if a population center is at a location where there are both oil wells and refineries for the oil from those wells, the area has a better chance of having fuel than an island in the middle of the Pacific with nothing to sell other than tourism. Thus, Houston, Texas, will likely have fuel, even when models suggest there will be shortfalls in many places.

Often writers concerned about resource shortages talk about the core and the periphery. The core needs to be near whatever source of energy is available that can be used to help grow crops and transport goods. At this point, oil is the fuel that is closest to filling this need. Electricity is a nice-to-have, and it can provide services like refrigeration for food. But it is not good for paving roads or building bridges. So, it can only add to the mix, not substitute completely for oil. Slave labor is the closest substitute for oil that the world has discovered. We would rather not go back to using such an approach.

[7] I am concerned that a major downward economic step will be necessary in the upcoming months and years, but I am hopeful that the meeting between President Trump and President Xi on May 14-15 can help smooth the way.

We are at a point at which it is clear that the current organization of the global economy is not working. I hope that the meeting between Trump and Xi will help put an end to fighting in the Middle East. I also hope it will help pave the way for a new path forward.

I expect that the path ahead will be a difficult one, both for the people in the Americas and the people in the World ex Americas. While the US has considerable energy supplies, it lacks manufacturing capability for many everyday goods. The US is also lacking in many critical minerals, especially those used in making high-tech products. With its high wages, it will need extremely high prices, unless processes can be made very efficient.

The World ex Americas may have an even more difficult step down. Its oil supply was already more stretched before the Iran War. Its overpopulation problem seems to be worse than that of the Americas. The World ex Americas is more directly affected by the damage done in the Middle East and the resulting loss of oil supply. And there seem to be many groups looking for war, even if the US leaves.

Let’s all keep our fingers crossed that the upcoming meeting will have a beneficial effect, both in the short term and in working toward a longer-term solution.

About Gail Tverberg

My name is Gail Tverberg. I am an actuary interested in finite world issues - oil depletion, natural gas depletion, water shortages, and climate change. Oil limits look very different from what most expect, with high prices leading to recession, and low prices leading to financial problems for oil producers and for oil exporting countries. We are really dealing with a physics problem that affects many parts of the economy at once, including wages and the financial system. I try to look at the overall problem.
This entry was posted in Energy policy, News Related Post, Oil and Its Future, oil shortages and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1,205 Responses to China and US Trade Talks: A Solution for Oil Shortages?

  1. Itrustmydog says:

    George Gammon maths on the bond bugout
    Love George because I love realists.
    After all I’m here in Gails garden.
    Good conflicting paradigm debt analysis.
    Will oil supply reduction mean debt matters?

    Debt matters?

    That would be very bad.
    Talk about deterrents.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f82j4VK4RBE&t=221s&pp=2AHdAZACAcoFGkJvbmQgbWFya2V0IGJyZWFrcyBHZW9yZ2Ug

    • This situation looks like it won’t end well. Ever-rising spending for military, higher cost for oil, too much debt. Debt defaults ahead?

      • Gannon points out later that the economy needs to grow rapidly to repay debt at high interest rates.

        But we know this can’t happen if energy supplies are constrained. The shortage of supply that leads to high prices is also likely to lead to constrained growth/recession.

    • Interestingly, I’ve never heard from types like Gammon, how to get ahead.
      To the contrary I know by happen stance several quite personally unimpressive, perhaps in many respects even partially primitive personalities, who just could ” smell the lure ” of the next future scheme – and place ” the bet ” at the right time for various things as it unfolded in the recent decades, be it various tech IPOs, high gain political or even sport venues.. , resulting in ~10.000x gains etc. Perhaps that’s just how the world rolls..

  2. Itrustmydog says:

    Risk off! Trump ain’t gonna get his “run it hot” economy.
    Rates can’t check inflation if IRGC don’t roll the doggys.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-vA1Q5TUVCs&pp=ugUEEgJlbg%3D%3D

    • reante says:

      Dollar inflation. The biggest boogeyman of the 2020s. It’s a problem.

      Problem Reaction Solution.

    • Inflation for (some) commodities.

      Stocks, bonds and asset prices tend to go down. Big problem with debt.

      Title: “MUCH PAIN LIES AHEAD FOR CONSUMERS, HOUSING, STOCKS, BONDS, GOLD – RATE CUT HOPES ARE NOW DEAD”

      • reante says:

        The growth phase cultural desire for low rates becomes a destructive bargaining with the situation once collapse phase energy decline arrives because money is a proxy for energy surpluses. That’s a problem, and another problematic aspect of the King Lear charade that gaslights about low rates though when looking under the hood the Hand has Lear hire a rate setting hawk in Warsh who’s position will not be affected by the coup.

        Rate setting of the reserve currency goes away as a functional tool of monetary policy during energy collapse because the energy dynamic itself takes over the (negative) rate setting (in nominal terms) and all that the monetarists can do is leave the policy rate at zero. But as we currently transition to that deflationary end state we will see the Fed be highly responsive in raising rates because energy throughput has dislocated bigly which dislocates bigly the reserve currency money supply
        relative to available goods and services. We can call that high Fed responsiveness rev matching, which is when a motorcyclist is slowing down and blips the throttle while downshifting in order to counter the high engine compression that motorcycles have. The increased monetary throttle is the closing of rate-setting lending spigot that needs matching to the dislocation of a lower gear being introduced as represented by the Hormuz closure. Otherwise, the reserve currency suffers an inflationary spike that causes all of the other currencies to get destroyed, which destroyed currencies cause a positive feedback loop of more inflationary pressure on the dollar as it is forced to chase oil without the assistance of the destroyed currencies, ultimately causing a runaway dynamic that hyperinflates all currencies and chaotically collapses the civilization in no time at all.

        So look for a hawkish Fed.

        Yellen was dovish.
        Powell is a centrist.
        Warsh is hawkish.

        That is the sequence one would expect when an intelligent civilization is transitioning from growth to collapse.

        • So, you are of the opinion that nobody can’t effectively hide before the wrath of imploding (legacy) dominant reserve currency? All, the quasi barter agreements in their own currencies ala BR(/I)Cs and or US focusing more on its hemisphere.. is just a 2nd/3tier playground to the main stage essentially ?

          I’m not sure about that, it mostly depends on the profile – timing of the collapse sequence. And apparently the non-US faction is trying to slow-down any possible ricocheting action-vector out there.

          In practical terms, take the increased assertiveness of CHN in recent ~two decades as they are pro-actively disengaging from the former biz partner #1: be it export destination as well as food security imports. That’s no longer the case now.

          Very likely some sort of USSR implosion re-hash could be re-played again, obviously in very different draperies, we could even get small n-skirmish, de-pop of few B in 2-3rd world locales and so on..

          • reante says:

            There is no regional sequence to the collapse of global fascism because it’s not regional. It’s global. Any region collapsing collapses the whole thing. Complexity theory 101.

            Therefore nobody can hide from the wrath of dollar or yuan or rouble or rupee etc debt collapse. Globalization is a cooperative venture, so the only way to maintain civilizational MPP during Collapse is cooperatively, and the only question regarding the ability to cooperate during the collapse of complexity is whether or not the international politics of the civilization has been simplified at the supranational level. In the s Hand, I argue that it has. If one is not inclined to conspiracy then it can still be argued that nuclear MAD forces cooperation on the nuclear powers, or else. And that nuclear powers can collectively force that cooperative will onto non- nuclear nations with the assured destruction of the latter group if they don’t cooperate with a plan to maintain civilizational MPP. Civilizational MPP is the rational choice for all member nations regardless of the unequal distribution of Collapse that is a function of natural law.

            Then there’s the technical plan for dealing with the global debt that maximizes MPP. The hyperinflating currencies of the world journey towards a painful journey of debt jubilee and are able to optimize that painful journey by recycling their failing currencies into dollar stablecoins, and in exchange the dollar journeys painfully into debt jubilee via debt destruction as optimized by the parallel, separate but equal, nationalized new stablecoin dollar. Symbiosis is what guarantees MPP. Symbiosis maximizes peace which maximizes MPP. It’s always darkest before the dawn, and the Hand is pumping geopolitical darkness as the Problem that requires a peaceful and cooperative Solution.

            The stablecoin regime will not be hegemonic. It will be the foundation of symbiotic mutual aid.

          • Well, that still sounds like ” eating the pie ” while keeping in intact on the table..

            To oversimplify there are two basic scenarios ahead:

            – classic replacement of legacy hegemonic power through internal implosion or lost (direct) war effort at key hist. junction

            – some sort of fusion of culture and policies among the competitors

            In my view, the world is still much divided for the #2 option, hence I’m voting ( probability ) as 65% option #1 vs 34% for the second one.

            PS perhaps we can (even) also debate both options in some form of close succession-occurrence also as per hist. precedent

            • reante says:

              There is nothing about that Phase 2 symbiotic monetary dynamic that resembles wanting to have your cake and eat it too. But if you’re just not understanding it, then you’re still free to make an actual argument in favor of that faulty position.

              Your two scenarios make it clear that you are incapable of realizing that this is a global civilization that is far, far greater than the sum of its parts. The parts cannot independently survive as civilizations unto themselves no matter how much the political theater would have you believe otherwise. It’s a gordian knot. Until you understand that, you are not participating in complexity theory. If you’re not participating in complexity theory then you’re not participating in systems theory, only opinion.

            • Perhaps, I merely evaluated the current situation from the standard history run narrative.

              For example, tall ships arrived, carrying mounted blokes on horses with guns and in shiny armor, and voila in few yrs times, entire Central and South American civilizations vanished.

              Your approach is the present all jolly good we are after-all intermixed already (w. the CHNs) into one single complex civ.

              I’d not bet on it mid/long termish though.

            • reante says:

              Right. Understand that my collapse analysis falls within the context of mature industrialism. Regional low industrial salvage-based agricultural civilization will possibly survive on a regional basis but that isn’t a topic that interests me much because by the time that happens I won’t be able to cover it anyway because I’ll be too busy living it and without access to global information.

              But none of those regional futures have any bearing on this civilizational collapse.

        • One take-away: It is necessary to slow down lending if resources aren’t available to build new mines and factories. High interest rates will tend to keep people and businesses from borrowing.

          Too much lending will tend to lead to even more inflation. Such inflation would be especially bad for the US because it holds the reserve currency, indirectly affected all other countries..

  3. I think that the reason why we are not seeing much about the Trump-Xi conference in the papers is because the US press that was sent over there was very definitely excluded from hearing anything confidential that went on. Before the conference, little was published about the upcoming event, and afterwards, virtually zero seems to have been published in Chinese papers.

    Tim Groves posted this link previously, after Day 1.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5AU1JCV8II

    As far as I can tell, both China and the US are facing concerning economic situations and very divided populations. The official press is trying to keep a lid on publicity about any need for change, but the issue keeps seeping out into the general public. The video linked above shows the huge crowds that greeted Trump on this visit, despite the lack of coverage in the official press.

    China needs to make changes, but Xi cannot yet talk about the dire issues it is facing that require these changes. It cannot let the story seep out into the press. So the press is being cut off from what is being cut off from the visit. The strange press coverage reminds me of the strange US press coverage at the time of covid.

    One rather bizarre thing this video points out is that Mario Rubio was along on this visit. He is a major critic of China. He has sanctioned China and China has sanctioned him. Yet, he is shown shaking hands with President Xi in China.

    Ms. Lei says she will have another video this weekend.

    • Tim Groves says:

      Well spotted, Gail. Lei points out that the Chinese newspapers have started to spell Rubio’s name with different Chinese characters recently. She speculates that this may have been done in order to allow him into the country despite the sanction. And this story is in all the major world media.

      But as this 2-minute video from CNN explains, there were initially several different renderings of Rubio’s name in the Chinese media, and it has only been standardized since he joined Trump’s administration. And in any case, the Chinese can bend or ignore their own sanctions any time it suits them.

      https://edition.cnn.com/2026/05/14/world/video/marco-rubio-china-name-change-ldn-digvid-vrtc

      • reante says:

        Trump forcing Xi to shake hands with Rubio and Stephen Miller doesn’t exactly fit with the narrative that Trump was supplicating himself to Xi while simultaneously Xi was symbolically feting Trump with 170 dead Minab virgins and Epstein girls in defilement. To the cognoscenti of the Hand’s political theater that looks more like a two-lane highway to hell.

  4. I don’t see David with many names recently, which is a not a good sign since he was always optimistic.

    As the days of English speaking animals are nearing their end, the rich will retreat to the prepper vaults while the rest will just suffer.

    I think this year will end more ore less in a stable shape, next year is iffy but 2028 will see the chaos.

    • Cynic says:

      David simply switched to commenting on Tim Morgan’s blog.

      Yes, the rich will retreat to their fortresses: I myself have built a watch tower, of modest dimensions, so that I might shoot down the orc hordes should they try to intrude on my beautiful rose beds, apple trees and vegetable beds.

      If they were to penetrate the trip-wires and man traps (oh what fun I had devising those!) they wouldn’t appreciate them anyway, would they?

      Boiling oil to pour would be nice, too: imagine the screams, Kulm. The screams…….

      If you can think of any other way of ridding the world of ghastly Untouchables, do let me know.

      Prisoners – and I hope to take few – will be tortured as a matter of course.

      • dig a woman trap—she will be more use around the house

      • The rich and fortresses – again the art (tech du jour) of war changed dramatically just as in a historical microsecond. The cheap drones carrying superexpl. sized as soda bottle are here to stay as the mass manuf. capacity for them still increases..

        Hence the rich must further isolate themselves, meaning 35-100km perimeter at the minimum. And that excludes most of the pseudo rich (also run / pretend ) from the true core pool..

    • Mentioned several times over past few weeks/months how DaveinMyrs significantly re-adjusted his timeline recently towards possible mid 2030s threshold even for the #1tier world.. Perhaps it serves as general point of measurement-guesstimate..

      • D Stevens says:

        DaveinMyrs? How do I find this information? Google search says this person passed away 2 years ago so think I’m finding the wrong results.

        • ivanislav says:

          “david in a month or a year or a decade” or something like that was his handle. JR is just abbreviating.

  5. postkey says:

    “ . . . why renewables cannot replace fossil fuels, which also just add additional “logs” to the fossil fueled bonfire of energy, which continues to grow faster than renewables do — they’ve been 80% or more of total energy use for decades. The main reason renewables cannot replace fossils is that they depend on fossil fuels in every single step of their life cycle “?
    https://energyskeptic.com/2026/more-and-more-and-more-one-of-the-best-books-on-energy-ever-written/

    • This is a link to Alice Friedemann’s post regarding a new book called “More and More and More: An All-Consuming History of Energy” by Jean Baptiste Fressoz, published in August 2025.

      She provides excerpts from the book.

    • Mike Jones says:

      CPM…Critical Path Method..like that one from my college operational management course way way back…yeah most folks muss that one, I’m 😳 afraid. Got to deal with one before jumping to the next stage. Afraid humans never dealt with overshoot population and just playing or toying around with so called solutions…rather amusing and entertaining….always enjoy hearing about miracle babies being birthed by couples in their 40s to 50s because they can “afford” to do it…and on the other spectrum one having 12 and complaining her snap is being cut back…yeah, right…

      Opening the straight to let fertilizer trough will prevent starvation…the petri dish says otherwish

      • We are indeed reaching limits in many ways. I understand from the write-up on Amazon that “More and More and More” is concerned about climate change from all of these fuels. But too many people is really the underlying issue. The system has to somehow stop and probably retreat.

  6. raviuppal4 says:

    No LPG , no jet fuel and now stage 3 — no diesel , no petrol . Petrol pumps are getting supply by rotation from the oil companies . I have switched on to English subcaptions for ease .

  7. Mike Jones says:

    Iran Announces Strait Of Hormuz Is Open To All Ships If They Cooperate With Its Navy
    By MI News Network May 15, 2026
    Shipping News
    https://www.marineinsight.com/iran-announces-strait-of-hormuz-is-open-to-all-ships-if-they-cooperate-with-its-navy-2/

    “Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi stated that the Strait of Hormuz remains open to commercial traffic, but ships must cooperate with the Iranian Navy and the authorities while navigating the region.

    He spoke with Iranian state media ahead of the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in New Delhi and blamed the U.S for creating instability in the region and imposing an “illegal blockade” affecting Iranian ports and maritime activities.

    He also said that the difficulties around ship movements were due to American actions in the Gulf and not due to any restrictions imposed by Iran, which has made its stance very clear.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi stated that the Strait of Hormuz remains open to commercial traffic, but ships must cooperate with the Iranian Navy and the authorities while navigating the region.

    He spoke with Iranian state media ahead of the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in New Delhi and blamed the U.S for creating instability in the region and imposing an “illegal blockade” affecting Iranian ports and maritime activities.

    He also said that the difficulties around ship movements were due to American actions in the Gulf and not due to any restrictions imposed by Iran, which has made its stance very clear.

    ….He targeted the Trump administration for failing to engage in ‘serious diplomacy’ to resolve the ongoing crisis, which is affecting every country..”

    Hmm…how does one define “illegal”?….Here comes de Judge…who chooses de Judge?

    • I think China is increasingly calling the shots. Let’s all get back to work folks.

      • Itrustmydog says:

        Hurray! Looks like you were right Gail.! This is fabulous news.
        Rolling rolling rolling. Get them doggys rolling!

        • reante says:

          Because jet fuel is the future.

          • Itrustmydog says:

            Lol. How true. But I will take whatever extension happens with gratitude.

            • reante says:

              The Challah Bread Inshallah Bread Ceasefire feathering mechanism of the sledgehammer mechanism is the extension. It’s hopiumism to think that TSHTF is reversible. Capture bondage to civilization causes us to bargain. Bargaining ruins our ability to analyze the situation which destroys the discourse by making the discourse unreliable. Makes us unreliable. No center of gravity.

              When the Hand says jump we say how high? And then the Hand says sit, and we sit? Then the Hand says jump and again we say how high?

              What’s more important? The Hand’s recreational doggy tricks at our expense or our reliability to reality?

    • ivanislav says:

      No toll? China leaned on Iran, I guess.

      • Nathanial says:

        Strange I am not seeing anyone else reporting this…

        • drb753 says:

          not on cnn, RT, or China daily.

        • WSJ headline in its US paper edition today is, “Trump, Xi Hail Reset After Summit: Choreographed visit masks differences as both sides seek to stabilize relations.”

          Its on-line title is a little different.
          https://www.wsj.com/world/china/tightly-choreographed-visit-masks-big-differences-between-u-s-and-china-afa01180

          The article starts:

          At the end of President Trump’s state visit to China on Friday, with Air Force One lifting off through the haze at Beijing’s airport, both sides hailed a reset in relations—though each has a starkly different idea of what that means. . .

          The shared desire for stable relations is a change after years of mutual antagonism.

          There is a call out that says, “Disagreements didn’t cool Trump’s show of admiration for Xi.”

          I don’t think most papers really want this result or believe that a change can start happening so quickly. Their editorial policy says, “Downplay this.” Xi will be coming to the US for a meeting at the White House on September 24.

          • Nathanial says:

            Trump looked very weak and definitely defeated on this trip… sad….orange man is going down…. But que up the BNS ! (Big Nuclear Scandal!)
            People are grasping at straws hoping for something out of nowhere!!!

      • ivanislav says:

        I see some of Araghchi’s statements here and I am guessing the article Mike Jones posted is a mis-translation / misinterpretation of his statements.

        Here are his video statements and it seems he’s just repeating the status quo Iranian stance: “The strait is open to all who are not at war with us.”
        https://youtu.be/q9Uk1gJkkLk?t=165

        • raviuppal4 says:

          The terms are clear .
          1. The SOH is open for our friends and closed for our enemies .
          2 . All friends must pay the toll for transit .
          3 . We reserve the right to exempt some special friends ( example China) from the toll . We also reserve the right to define ” special” and ” not special ” .
          Simple to understand .

          • Itrustmydog says:

            So friend status depends on cargo origin or flag or destination? My guess cargo origin and destination. So not completely open? Can Saudi pay a toll and pass?;

          • Mike Jones says:

            Come on, folks, let’s be reasonable, shall we.
            It’s a new world order. Donnie list, and its all his fault, and the winner makes the rules…get over it already

            • Itrustmydog says:

              As Raviji said not too long ago.. whether the strait is called open or closed don’t matter. What matters is if oil and other critical materials are moving through. Every day that don’t happen is another nail in the coffin of the world economy not too mention famine.
              I certainly hope the oil and critical materials are moving through the strait.
              You are aware Araghchi declared the strait “completely open” a month ago and little oil has moved through? Did IRGC get the memo?
              I certainly share your disdain for Trump. Disdain doesn’t get oil out of the gulf either.
              Was a deal cut in Beijing? I certainly hope so.

        • Itrustmydog says:

          Yes he said the same thing a month ago. “Strait is completely open”.
          I certainly hope something new is here perhaps brokered by China. That would be welcome indeed.

          One would think if that was true we would see doggys (tankers); rolling..

          I don’t know but I wonder whether IRGC is dog or tail.

          Ultimately the dude on the marine band radio saying pass or shall not pass determines whether the doggys roll.

          • raviuppal4 says:

            Until the insurance companies give the green light nothing moves . Open or closed is just a matter for intellectual discussion .

    • Hubbs says:

      Judge? Who needs a judge? Everything is predetermined, whether you are in divorce, trying to sue your attorneys for declared legal malpractice in KY, facing KY state medical board disciplinary action or investigation by the NC State Medical Board or its hitman, the NC Physicians Health Program (NCPHP). It’s all a sham. Corrupt to the core. My Medical-Legal Back Pages. Publisher Archway. Pen name Bryce Sterling.

      On a grander scale, consider the Brunson case before the US Supreme Court re: evidence of rigged Biden-Trump 2020 elections. if evidence is not allowed, then every case is reduced to an allegation, i.e., a statement without proof. The case is dismissed for lack of evidence. How convenient.

      In Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, the phrase “Sentence first—verdict afterwards” is a satirical demand made by the Queen of Hearts during the trial of the Knave of Hearts in Chapter 12, “Alice’s Evidence.”

      When the King of Hearts attempts to let the jury consider their verdict, the Queen interrupts, insisting that the punishment be decided before the guilt is determined. Alice rejects this arbitrary judicial process, shouting, “Stuff and nonsense! The idea of having the sentence first!” This confrontation marks a turning point where Alice grows to her full size, refuses to be intimidated by the court’s nonsense, and ultimately dismisses the entire assembly as “nothing but a pack of cards,” causing the trial to collapse.

      The phrase has since entered common usage to denounce arbitrariness and the miscarriage of justice, specifically criticizing systems where outcomes are predetermined without fair deliberation.

  8. Itrustmydog says:

    Irans five preconditions for negotiation rejected. No surprise there.

    IMO the five preconditions effectively cancel Trump’s out which is to say it’s all worth it so Iran doesn’t get nukes. The five preconditions mean capitulation prior to negotiations. The obvious conclusion. Iran is fine with the standoff.

    I also think Iran understood the consequences of keeping the strait closed more than most nations. I think it might be part of their decision to cultivate it as a deterent for decades. The moderates that have been killed may have had a greater understanding of what sort of world closing the strait would create. The hardliners are running a game plan.

    Closing the strait is a weapon. Both parties are using it as a weapon. The war is not ended. There is no ceasefire. In war you destroy the enemies assets. The strait is being used to destroy by both parties to destroy enemy assets. The world as we know it is collateral damage.

    You never corner a powerful opponent. You always leave them a way out. I don’t think Irans preconditions allow this. Hardliners are breaking a primary rule. It’s a dice throw what happens. Their tolerance for risk is ill considered. Only Trump’s catastrophic decision to start this war of choice is more ill considered..

    Collateral damage. That’s what makes a mutually assured destruction deterent what it is.

    https://iranwire.com/en/news/152453-al-jazeera-correspondent-all-iranian-conditions-for-resuming-negotiations-rejected/

    • edpell3 says:

      Israel refuses to nuke Iran for fear Russia and China would nuke Israel (and Manhattan?). But will Russia and China allow carpet bombing of Iran?

    • reante says:

      Once again a premium analysis, dog, though the Iranian hardliners are leaving the US a way out. It’s just that that way out is only recognizable to those with eyes to see the Big Picture of the Non-Public Degrowth Agenda. America is about to Collapse. The World is about to Collapse. That way out of course is the anti-imperialist American Coup. Problem solved, if not the civilizational predicament for which there is no solution.

      • x-soviet says:

        will the Military promptly and permanently neutralize the feral parasites and violent criminals?
        If not, will the Military use the feral parasites and violent criminals to actually help oppress remaining middle class and, otherwise, remaining civilized humans?

        Why am I asking – I’ve read (less than a month ago), that Ukrainian military “recruiters” are mobilizing local Slovakians gypsies in the rural outskirts of the (southern) Odessa region, and those alpha-Slovakiansgypsies are violently and mercilessly hunt meekish local Slavic males and securely transfer those weak Slavs to “recruiters” in exchange for non-trivial monetary rewards…

        • reante says:

          I expect it to be a very orderly transition with the immediate announcement of an interim civilian president (you know who I think that will be). So I don’t even really expect any kind of martial law situation as part of the coup, but martial law might be part of the picture by that point anyway since the coup does require existential-appearing justification. But if that’s the case I’d expect the political relief associated with the coup to end the mass unrest.

          And I don’t expect problem with the remaining MAGA base as it will be too humbled by that point by having voted for King Lear.The interim administration will be truly populist and America First and MAGA will be neutralized.

          Like I always said, people basically need to be begging to be saved from the administration even if a coup isn’t really part of the conversation because an American coup is so far outside the Overton window because ‘American exceptionalism.

        • The bottom line for UKRo situation -> officially ~6M people left the country since 2022, and ~similar number even prior to that as a result of that violent revolution in early 2010s, the estimates vary from ~12-20M total outbound emigration ( in all directions ), also mostly biased towards young – child bearing generations. Also ~10M is considered internally displaced.

          In recent months the energy infrastructure has been even more priority-targeted, and this can’t be replaced ( quickly / never ), chiefly various grid transformer stations, also hundreds of locomotives vanished and similar hard to replace tech equip. etc.

          In summary much of the country as per industrial age setting does not exist anymore. The future for ~ 3/4 of the entire realm is to revert to ~pastoral existence ( if not abandoned ), and perhaps only some very sporadic / token industrial hubs renewed.

          • x-soviet says:

            In summary much of the country as per industrial age setting does not exist anymore. The future for ~ 3/4 of the entire realm is to revert to ~pastoral existence ( if not abandoned ), and perhaps only some very sporadic / token industrial hubs renewed.

            That all is largely true, and maybe it is for the better…
            Next on the chopping block – “Slovakia”, “Hungary”, “Austria”, “Belarus” and some other useless malformations (hat tip to Kulm – for continuous human-loving inspiration 😅)

            • Hungary as former co-empire already atrophied into its sub nucleus black hole – leaving many of its own folks across the new borders ( aftermath of WWI/II ).

              Slovakia – national coherent state – could be perhaps taken over by Poland in some crazy future scenario.

              Austria – a bit similar to HU as already shrink-ed former hegemon. But perhaps most importantly it functions in today’s world a bit as another CH – basically a parking lot for foreign money. Lot of Gulfies bln. vacationing there and heavily invested.

              Don’t follow much developments in Belarus – but evaluating to be RU’s vassalage / colony and could be ( again ) re-integrated by them at some future point in time..

  9. Itrustmydog says:

    No way Iran is going to let their arch enemy UAE export oil out of Fujairah.
    One sank one seized. Iran has stated participants in the war can not pass. That’s all of the monarchs. IMO opening the strait with Iran in charge means Iran and Iraq export no one else. Saudi exports via east west pipeline.
    https://www.opb.org/article/2026/05/15/tensions-flare-near-strait-of-hormuz/

  10. China won’t arm Iran is good news!

    https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-claims-xi-offered-help-to-open-hormuz-vowed-china-won-t-arm-iran-1778772642135#goog_rewarded

    US President Donald Trump on Thursday (May 14) said that President Xi Jinping had offered China’s help to open the Strait of Hormuz as tensions continue in the Gulf region, crippling global energy supplies. He added that Xi has vowed not to send military equipment to aid Iran in its war against the US and Israel. This comes after the two leaders met in Beijing for the first time in a decade for a high-stakes summit.

    There is also a photo of the two men shaking hands.

    https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260514/image-1778774422557.jpg?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&imwidth=800&imheight=600&format=webp&quality=medium

    • drb753 says:

      We are supposed to take what Trump says with a grain of salt.

      • But some of what he says may be true. The handshake photo is very I linked to shows more than a usual handshake.

        • drb753 says:

          Is it conceivable that he left some important things unsaid?

        • Foolish Fitz says:

          “But some of what he says may be true”

          The evidence of his whole life would suggest otherwise and in this particular example, not a single thing is true. To put it bluntly, he’s full of shit.

          On nuclear, China has done no more than repeat its consistent stance, no more weapons please, from anyone. They are very clear that Iran has every right to continue it’s nuclear industry and no one has the right to tell them otherwise.

          On Hormuz, China would like nothing to impede trade, but they won’t tell Iran how to behave in their own territory when attacked and again they have been very clear about this. They have even use the term Iranian archipelago.

          We can do this for every fraudulent claim(that’s all of them) concerning China’s stance on Iran.

          I’m suspicious that the new master may have chucked a bone to the financial reps, that have all been unusually quite, but if that includes “opening up” it might well be seen as treason by a large percentage of the population, as the Chinese negotiators in that field are all viewed as bananas(Anglophiles). I’ve read a single official press release that mentioned it, but it’s not mentioned anywhere else and I’ve checked at least half a dozen, plus state media reports.

    • FWIW, Zerohedge says:

      https://www.zerohedge.com/political/us-and-china-agree-establish-trade-and-investment-boards-trump-xi-summit-delivers-modest

      US And China Agree To Establish Trade And Investment Boards As Trump-Xi Summit Delivers Modest Wins

      U.S. and Chinese leaders agreed to establish a new “Board of Trade” and a parallel “Board of Investment” during President Donald Trump’s two-day visit to Beijing – a summit that ended much as it began: with significant pageantry, warm personal rapport between the leaders, and modest, incremental progress on trade. The new boards aim to oversee bilateral purchases, manage trade differences, facilitate deals in non-sensitive sectors (with roughly $30 billion in goods identified), and provide a standing channel to prevent future escalations without constant high-level intervention. . .

      This development aligns with Xi Jinping’s broader push to reframe the bilateral relationship as one of “constructive strategic stability” – a new guiding vision intended to provide predictability for the next three years and beyond, emphasizing cooperation as the mainstay while allowing for “moderate competition” and “manageable differences.” Xi described it as a positive, sound, constant, and enduring stability that should translate into concrete actions.

      Zerohedge categorizes the Iran Conflict as an area without breakthroughs. It says:

      Iran Conflict: Both leaders expressed a shared desire for stability and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, with Xi showing interest in greater U.S. oil purchases to reduce Middle East dependence. However, China offered no concrete commitments to leverage its influence with Tehran. Beijing’s foreign ministry reiterated support for peace efforts without pledging active intervention.

      I suppose this is as good an outcome as we can hope for at this stage, given that the US seemed to be losing in Iran. The process is incremental. It at least seems to be going somewhat in the right direction.

    • Except China never armed Iran to begin with

      China sold Iran equipment which could be used for military use but did not sell weaponry

    • edpell3 says:

      Good cop bad cop. Will Russia supply weapons?

  11. Itrustmydog says:

    Bond yields seem to be going up
    The strait closed doesn’t seem to be improving Japans situation
    Scroll down to chart
    Unwinding
    Now there’s a interesting word.

    https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/government-bond-yield

    • If prices go to $150+ in June, bond yields will likely rise every where. The value of US debt held by bank will tend to fall. This will happen everywhere.

      The link shows Japan’s interest rate rising.

      These changes could cause debt problems many places simultaneously, I would think.

  12. raviuppal4 says:

    TSHTF . Russian waiver expires tomorrow . 40% of imports at 2.3 mbpd .

    The world’s third-largest crude importer, India, has asked the United States to extend its waiver on sales of Russian oil already loaded on tankers beyond the current waiver expiry date, May 16, sources with knowledge of the matter told Bloomberg on Thursday.

    Since the middle of March, the U.S. Treasury has already extended twice waivers on the sale of Russian crude that’s already loaded onto tankers.

    In the latest waiver extension at the end of April, the U.S. Treasury Department extended the exemption by an additional two weeks until May 16.

    After the U.S. issued the first sanction waiver in March, a race began for Russian oil cargoes at sea, with several tankers even diverting from China to supply their cargoes to Indian buyers, according to shipping data from last month.

    Refiners in Asia have used the sanctions waiver to stock up on Russian crude, with India actively scooping up large volumes of Russia’s oil, after it was discouraged by the U.S. early this year from importing high volumes of Russian oil.

    Over the past few weeks, India’s imports of crude from the Middle East plunged, but imports from Russia surged and almost doubled in March compared to February. Middle Eastern supply to India plunged by 61% to 1.18 million bpd in March, while Russian supply almost doubled from February to 2.25 million bpd in March, thanks to the U.S. waiver on purchases of Russian crude that’s already loaded on tankers.

    India’s oil imports from Russia hit a record high of 2.3 million barrels per day (bpd) in the first two weeks of May, per Kpler data cited by Bloomberg.

    The unprecedented flows of Russian crude into India so far this month suggest that the third-biggest crude importer in the world will fight to have continued access to Russia’s crude despite the trade frictions with the USA .

  13. Itrustmydog says:

    Day 77
    My how time flys
    David where are you?
    The bands back together.
    BAU tonight baby!

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2848100/

    • The link is to a long essay written in 2010 by William C. Roberts, MD.

      It starts out talking about the importance of oil to society, and then covers other topics that are going well. Regarding Israeli Entrepreneurship, it starts out:

      Dan Senor and Saul Singer have recently published Start-Up Nation, which demonstrates that Israel represents the greatest concentration of innovation and entrepreneurship in the world today (12). In 2008, per capita venture capital investments in Israel were 2.5 times greater than in the USA, more than 30 times greater than in Europe, 80 times greater than in China, and 350 times greater than in India. Comparing absolute numbers, Israel, a country of 7.1 million people, attracted close to $2 billion in venture capital, as much as flowed to the United Kingdom’s 61 million citizens or to the 145 million living in Germany and France combined. And Israel was the only country to have a meaningful increase in venture capital from 2007 to 2008. After the USA, Israel has more companies listed on NASDAQ than any other country in the world, including India, China, Korea, Singapore, and Ireland.

      I read elsewhere that the percentage of college grads is very high among Jewish people–not necessarily those in Israel..

  14. MG says:

    I tried the recent local LLM (qwen3.6-35b-a3b-uncensored-hauhaucs-aggressive) and asked it to provide deep analysis of the world development for the next decades based on ourfiniteworld.com:

    “Based on an analysis of blogs and comments on Our Finite World (run by Gail Tverberg), here is a deep dive into world development for the coming decades. The site is known for its perspective that the economy is a physics-based system dependent on energy, facing limits to growth.

    1. Key Forming Factors
    Diminishing Returns: The world is entering a phase where extracting resources (oil, coal, minerals) requires increasingly more energy and money for the same yield. The cheapest and easiest sources are already depleted.
    The Debt Limit: Debt has served as “energy” to drive the economy but has now hit its limit. High interest rates and massive government debt require ever-higher taxes, squeezing ordinary incomes.
    Imbalance Between Population and Resources: While population grows, resources per capita shrink. This strains system complexity (healthcare, education, infrastructure) beyond what is sustainable.
    2. Development Scenario to 2035
    According to the site’s analysis, the global economy will trend toward contraction over the next decade rather than growth.

    Energy Crisis & High Energy Costs: There is an anticipated decline in oil production (especially from US shale fields due to low prices) and coal. The transition to renewables is costly; solar and wind have lower energy returns on investment (EROI) than fossil fuels.
    Economic Simplification (“Simplification”): The complex global economy will simplify:
    Diet: A shift away from meat toward plant-based food due to the high cost of livestock farming.
    Travel & Trade: Reduced international travel and trade; manufacturing moves closer to home (reshoring).
    Employment: An oversupply of college graduates compared to available jobs requiring degrees.
    Political Instability: High costs of complexity and poverty among citizens lead to political shifts. Leaders will push for “simplification”—cutting unnecessary programs, reducing healthcare spending (where costs rise faster than benefits), and trimming social safety nets.
    Geopolitics: Tension between the US and China; both blocs striving for energy and food self-sufficiency.
    3. Conclusion
    The next decade marks a transition from an era of growth to one of sustainability and contraction. The economy cannot grow as fast due to physical limits (energy) constraining financial possibilities. Society must adapt to lower energy intensity, resulting in simplified lifestyles and local self-reliance.”

    • That description is pretty good. I might quibble with why the renewables have difficulty in replacing fossil fuels. Renewables are only extenders of fossil fuels. Intermittency is a huge issue. So is the need to fund the system long in advance of when the intermittent energy is produced. This leads to huge debt levels. Fossil fuels need less infrastructure. They give immediate benefit when they are burned.

    • drb753 says:

      would it not be easier to read the blog?

      • MG says:

        Today, people often look for summaries or use website content for AI prompting. Uncensored versions of LLMs paired with OFW views provide interesting results in analytics.

  15. raviuppal4 says:

    Oracle revokes IIT, NIT placement offers, leaves campus dreams hanging mid-air .
    https://www.indiatoday.in/jobs/story/oracle-revokes-campus-placement-offers-at-iits-nits-educ-2911628-2026-05-14

  16. raviuppal4 says:

    Here are 50 reasons oil rallies to $150+ in June (feel free to add more in the comments):

    https://x.com/morgan_downey/status/2055221929292837114

    • Oil prices may very well rise to $150+ in June. These high prices will have secondary impacts. They could lead to recession and falling asset prices, even as commodity prices are high.

      • May I ask you at which stage ( if ever ) you foresee real-significant carnage in the real estate bubble, here meaning chiefly residential / city dwellings.. , so could it be soonish under say 5yrs span or in way more distant future after more upheaval and twists (15-30yrs) so to speak .. ?

        • It would seem like we should see it sooner–that is, in the under 5 year range. Prices in many areas have already started to level off. Young people cannot afford to buy. There are too many homes that people are trying (not very successfully) to rent out as AirBNBs.

          It will be increasingly difficult to evict people living in these homes, I expect. Owners will be the ones with difficulties. Also banks.

          • Dennis L. says:

            Perhaps increased housing prices correlate well with the long period of decreasing interest rates.

            Dennis L.

            • Yes. And with very generous Federal Housing Authority downpayment rules, and treatment of missed payments.

              Rising prices of shares of stocks, and rising prices of farmland all follow this pattern, too.

              I wonder what could go wrong? Higher prices of oil => higher inflation => higher interest rates => falling asset prices.

              The same issue applies to long-term bonds. Such a bond falls in value, if it was issued at say, 3%, and the interest rate is now 5%. Rising interest rates can cause huge problems for banks. Net worth can become negative.

  17. raviuppal4 says:

    China bans export of Industrial grade Phosphoric Acid. Food grade still available to export. Sulphuric acid already banned .

    • Itrustmydog says:

      Another fertilizer hit! Ke sera green revolution.

      • This is an article I found on the supply chain for phosphoric acid. https://en.enzymecode.com/news/the-global-supply-chain-for-phos/

        China is one of a fairly large number of producers. One chart I found on a different site seemed to indicate that China produced about a quarter of the world’s total production.

        Regarding ways phosphoric acid is used, the article says:

        End-Use Industries: Fertilizer, Food, Water Treatment, and More

        Phosphoric acid is an essential ingredient in various industries, with the largest share of demand coming from the fertilizer industry, particularly for the production of phosphate fertilizers. Phosphoric acid is used to create ammonium phosphate, a crucial fertilizer compound that is in high demand for agricultural production globally.

        Other important sectors include:

        Food and Beverages: Phosphoric acid is widely used in the food industry as an acidulant, flavoring agent, and preservative, particularly in soft drinks, dairy products, and processed foods.

        Water Treatment: Phosphoric acid is a critical component in water purification processes, where it helps in treating drinking water and in wastewater management.

        Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care: Phosphoric acid is also used in the production of various pharmaceutical products, and its compounds are present in some personal care items, such as dental products and cosmetics.

        Electronics: Phosphoric acid is involved in the production of semiconductors and in metal treatments used in electronics manufacturing.

  18. reante says:

    Had gotten bored with the current crop of talking heads and have been listening to Malcolm Nance for the past week instead. Anti-conspiracy, but I like him. Former Navy guy intimately familiar with Hormuz and Persian Gulf military topography from his days in service.

    From mins 10-20 in today’s appearance on Nawfal’s show, who I like too, Malcolm presents some great King Lear coup fodder, and in a humorous fashion, in the context of the summit and how Trump is blatantly selling out Americans and endangering the country’s existence, which of course plenty of higher ups in the US military are well aware.

    https://www.youtube.com/live/vRlVsuWyKoo

  19. Fusty Ducker says:

    I’m increasingly convinced that all these end-of-the-world articles are nonsense. Nothing ever happens. We have everything we need to live comfortably; grocery stores are full, gasoline is abundant, and we lack nothing. The human species will always bounce back from anything. Degrowth is a myth and a profitable business for some people.

    • It comes when you least expect it

    • Young people are already experiencing the step down in the availability of affordable homes, and an affordable education. Some of them are discovering that what they learned doesn’t really allow high enough wages to repay the debt needed for the education.

      We don’t understand it, because the changes take place slowly.

      Some of these changes may soon speed up. They seem to be speeding up in some poor countries, right now.

    • Rodster says:

      Haha, gotta love the sarcasm!

      • I AM THE MOB says:

        The reason Europe got off Russian oil is because Russia is “running out” of oil.

        Amazing how obvious this is but right wingers always fall for the nonsense “political reasons” cause they believe political leaders hold all the cards. (since they admire them so much)

        • ivanislav says:

          You’re joking right? If not, know that Russia just redirected flows eastwards and some Russian flows reach Europe via intermediaries who take a cut.

      • From the article:

        government use of strategic reserves to hold prices down is positively homicidal – it means that essential diesel fuel (75% of which has to be imported in the UK) is being burned frivolously today when it is likely to be needed for maintaining critical infrastructure and ensuring at least some food deliveries later in the year. Indeed, a competent government would have introduced diesel fuel rationing months ago when there were still reserves in the tank… but then again, it has been many decades since the UK experienced competent government.

        Stage 2 is a supply chain problem that is difficult to predict exactly. Tim says:

        “For want of a nail, the shoe was lost; For want of a shoe, the horse was lost; For want of a horse, the rider was lost; For want of a rider, the battle was lost; For want of a battle, the kingdom was lost, And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.”

        The problem with globalised complexity being that we cannot see in advance where the nails, shoes, horses and riders are… we only find out how important they were when they are no longer available. And by that time, we will be in a cascading collapse as the failure of any part of our critical infrastructure rapidly impacts its neighbours so that the entire physical system becomes unsustainable.

        I am afraid Tim is right.

        In my view, regarding stocking up, we should be focusing on buying high-tech goods that may disappear from shelves completely. Also things like imported cheap pharmaceutical products.

    • Replenish says:

      You couldn’t get a straight answer from AI during the Covid reset but now it is throwing out some gems.. answer to why “nothing ever happens!!”

      “The massive global push into renewable energy functions less as a clean break from fossil fuels and more as an industrial “extend and pretend” mechanism, where the high-heat manufacturing of panels relies on a baseline of cheap, carbon-heavy energy like Chinese coal—essentially using today’s fossil fuels to construct a highly complex, resource-intensive infrastructure for tomorrow. This thermodynamic shell game hides the immense embedded energy costs of mining and refining raw materials behind misleadingly low Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) metrics, shifting the planetary bottleneck from atmospheric carbon to intense terrestrial resource depletion. Yet, this energetic stretching of industrial civilization is only half the equation; the true velocity of this transition is dictated by a deeper geopolitical playbook. When global limits to growth trigger systemic friction, elite institutions increasingly deploy centralized emergency protocols—leveraging the disruption of regional wars, pandemic lockdowns, and orchestrated color revolutions to forcefully shatter existing trade routes, ration civilian consumption, and rapidly restructure world energy and economic flows under the guise of crisis management. Far from being random catastrophes, these shocks serve as structural shock absorbers that allow the financial system to mask a terminal resource crunch with endless cycles of synthetic debt, extreme financialization, and artificial complexity—managing the managed decline of overshoot while desperately buying time for advanced AI to engineer a breakthrough before the thermodynamic runway completely runs out.”
      – Mr. Roboto

      • reante says:

        Did you frame your inputs to the robot in a conspiratorial context that caused its conspiratorialism?

        • Replenish says:

          Yes but it always reverted to approved narratives on “safe and effective” treatments even with conspiratorial prodding or cut the conversation short and claimed that it was limited to available data. Now when I prod with educated theories it will elaborate providing established links and updated projections or pushback with more likely options again with data that proves it point. How should I proceed since I’m building a reliably repeatable system for helping locally and then heading for the hills the later in the game? I’m also playing the wounded bird as usual to ping ideas off the Hand.

          • reante says:

            I don’t know how you should proceed beyond more trial and error. I don’t feel like I have enough information to go on. Good luck though.

    • Itrustmydog says:

      Talk about bad timing.

    • if youre living in south sudan, as an example—none of that is true

    • Tim Groves says:

      The reason why nothing ever happens could be because:

      “The dream is already ended and we’re already awake in the golden eternity.”

      —Jack Kerouac

      Jack also wrote that:

      “Happiness consists in realizing it is all a great strange dream.”

      50 inspirational and perspirational Jack Kerouac quotes await you here:

      https://quotefancy.com/jack-kerouac-quotes

  20. I AM THE MOB says:

    British man hauled out of Italian bar when he was meant to be in quarantine for hantavirus

    https://metro.co.uk/2026/05/13/hantavirus-brit-found-italian-bar-rather-quarantining-28358624/

    Houston pizza bar owner says he was arrested after dispute over health permit

    https://abc13.com/post/betelgeuse-owner-washington-avenue-restaurant-says-he-was-arrested-dispute-health-permit/19090596/

    Health departments aren’t playing around.

  21. postkey says:

    “They are a targeted volley of signal launched directly at the back of the brain where vision lives. The cortex lights up as if it is receiving real images, and you experience that artificial activation as a dream. The bizarre narrative your conscious mind invents around it later is just your brain trying to make sense of the noise. The dream is not the point. The dream is the side effect. The point is keeping the territory occupied. “?

    https://x.com/ihtesham2005/status/2054966941912367149?s=20

    • x-soviet says:

      “Eagleman and his co-author ran the same correlation across twenty-five primate species. The more plastic a species’ brain, the higher the proportion of REM sleep. The relationship held across the entire primate family tree.”

      And this strong evolutionary genealogic correlation makes it believable in my book. Very Occamish, persuasive explanation, indeed.

      • reante says:

        Yep, I absolutely believe it. I saw that long term light deprivation causes temporary blindness. Adaptation. And chronic poor sleep with inadequate REM cycles causes poor eyesight .Maladaptation.

      • Tim Groves says:

        What about more microplastics?
        Are they good for a species’ brain too? 🙂

    • Interesting:

      Memory consolidation is real. Emotional processing is real. Your brain does do those things at night. But Eagleman’s argument is that those functions piggyback on a much older system whose original job was simpler and more brutal. Keep the lights on inside the visual cortex while the planet is dark, or lose it.

      If part of the brain goes unused for a long period, other parts of the brain will try to take over using its space.

    • Foolish Fitz says:

      Thanks for that postkey, very interesting.

      Here’s the paper(I’ve saved for later reading).

      https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.632853/full

  22. ivanislav says:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W10DDzwtQk8

    Carl Zha thinks the US doesn’t have much to trade with China – USA might come away with an agreement to buy some soybeans, maybe some Boeing airplanes, but nothing more than that. Unclear whether there will be any deal on rare earths.

    • But at least they are starting somewhere.

      • raviuppal4 says:

        Trump returned empty handed . Period .
        China will buy 200 planes , Trump said . Hey the Chinese did not say that . Why is it always ” China wants and China promises ” — no written agreements . Flop show .

        • Foolish Fitz says:

          Lots of reporting about Trumps fictitious words, but has anyone reported on what Xi said. He is the one in charge after all, as witnessed by Trumps demeanor.

          Mentioning Thucydides Trap is quite the clue.

          I don’t know who this is and I haven’t followed events apart from reading a couple of Chinese opinions, but he seems to make a fair point(I’m guessing he sits firmly on the other side of the aisle).

          https://youtu.be/YqxaH9tLTwc?si=m0cl_GYXc3ALXzCe

          • reante says:

            While pointedly wishing Trump good health at his opening toasting of the summit lol, statesman Xi said this (nudge nudge wink wink):

            “Today, President Trump and I had in-depth exchanges on China-US relations and international and regional dynamics.
            We both believe that the China-US relationship is the most important bilateral relationship in the world. We must make it work and never mess it up.

            Both China and the United States stand to gain from cooperation and lose from confrontation. Our two countries should be partners rather than rivals.

            President Trump and I also agreed to build a constructive China-US relationship of strategic stability to promote the steady, sound and sustainable development of China-US relations and bring more peace, prosperity and progress to the world.”

            • Foolish Fitz says:

              You mean the usual platitudes given at a toast.

              Meaningless words, while Xi’s earlier statement and the 170 little children very pointedly showing how full of life they are, as all children should be, are being discussed everywhere.

              Still, travelling all that way to pay homage to the new boss, will probably be rewarded with a few trinkets to bandy about.

              Let’s see what today brings.
              China opening up to the US FIRE thieves was the stated goal(plus begging China to have a word with Iran), so we will know later.

              That word with Iran, will most probably be, carry on. This was announced yesterday(nice timing).

              https://en.mehrnews.com/news/244523/Chinese-vessels-start-transiting-Strait-of-Hormuz

          • drb753 says:

            I noted a first mention (probably ever) of the trap in italian MSM press yesterday. Also in Italy I note that RT and consciousnessofsheep are both blocked, as well as apparently one of my VPNs.

            • Foolish Fitz says:

              RT I understand, as that fits the present fiction, but consciousnessofsheep, come on. Does Tim really have such a large readership in Italy, that he could sway societal thinking?

            • drb753 says:

              Indeed I am no able to connect to consciousness but still not to RT. vpn working.

            • Con_sheep is not exactly blocked over EU, but since he redone the web/hosting? – the site demands various cookies now.. so in principled fashion I don’t support / read such sites anymore..

        • ivanislav says:

          It’s only day 1 of a 2-day summit.

        • Itrustmydog says:

          Written legally enforceable agreement have always been problematic between USA and China. This is a media success. Heck did you see that welcome? They love trump. 💕:)

        • Tim Groves says:

          Did you read that Xi and Trump had a private meeting with no officials present?

          The word is, Xi had his Harvard-educated daughter with him as his interpreter. Trump may have had a trusted interpreter along too. But no “regime” officials or “administration” officials in the room.

          This speculation was according to my trusted go-to source on China gossip, Lei.

          She also reports that Xi is four inches shorter than Trump, but in public appearance photos, they were the same height. So either, Trump has shrunk, Xi was wearing platform soles, or either one or both of them was a lookie-likie.

    • reante says:

      New discovery. Life operates on a need to know basis, and I didn’t need to know until now whether China was going to maintain its dollar peg or not during Phase 2 of the Non-Public Degrowth Agenda. It is not going to.

      The US Silent Diplomacy revolves around USD stablecoins. The US has stablecoin access to trade. No cooperation, no stablecoin access. (The IRGC still has stablecoin access.) That is not nothing to trade, that is everything to trade. That is the sword of damocles. Structurally, China is just a vassal economy of the globalist petrodollar economy. So on the bureaucratic level of the Silent Diplomacy that fleshes out the will of the Hidden Hand, thy will be done.

      China MPP for Phase 2 is served by breaking its dollar peg when the dollar enters the deflationary spiral otherwise the Yuan will also enter the spiral and China immediately won’t be able to service its astronomical Yuan debts. And for civilizational MPP, a deflating Yuan would remove the Cheap Factory To The World from the world by turning all of its goods into unobtainium. So breaking the peg and inflating the Yuan while buffering that inflation with stablecoin access is the only choice.

      Theater or reality, the choice is yours.

  23. Messaging seems to be very favorable after the first day of the summit. Zerohedge reports:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-xi-put-hormuz-iran-trade-taiwan-center-historic-beijing-summit

    After “Fantastic Day” With Xi, Trump Touts 200-Jet Boeing Deal As China Offers Hormuz Help

    Trump says Boeing Secured a 200 ‘Big’ jet order from China
    Trump says President Xi wants Hormuz reopened, won’t give Tehran weapons
    Trump, Xi Put Hormuz, Iran, Trade, Taiwan At Center Of Historic Beijing Summit

    WSJ says:
    https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/iran-us-china-news-2026

    White House Says Trump, Xi Agree Iran Shouldn’t Control Strait
    Trump invites the Chinese leader to visit the White House in September and hails ‘positive and productive’ meetings at the summit in Beijing

    • edpell3 says:

      Why does China need to buy 200 jets that China makes itself? Because the west refuses to certify the Chinese jet engines.

    • Nathanial says:

      Wow!! 🤩 Trumpet does it again! He truly is an amazing man!!!!
      If you believe this I have some great stuff to sell you!

    • Xabier says:

      UK air traffic update: flights over my London house now back to pre-war levels, more or less, since last Sunday, starting 4.30 am. At most only 10% down, I’d say.

      Supermarkets all fully stocked: no gaps, no lack of food imported from the EU., such as chorizo which makes me very happy.

      I’ll take a look to see if veg and fruit is still arriving from Africa, S America, Israel, etc (which I don’t eat). But as I said, no gaps visible.

      As David once said, BAU baby!

      • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chorizo
        “The chorizo ​​curing process can be done in different ways: drying in cold air and smoking with oak wood. For simple drying, the chorizo ​​is tied and exposed to the open air in a natural, cool and dry place. The choice of site is made based on temperature and humidity characteristics.”

        Similar ingredients but instead cured hot is the way of HU product:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_sausages

        I guess both have the very rare sub-variant where the pig is fatten-up (finished) on the fresh nuts in autumn. Obviously, the price is astronomic then.. or mostly eaten immediately by insiders (need to know basis) so no (public) price/volume at all hah..

        • Xabier says:

          As a Vasco-Navarro, I require a drip-feed of genuine chorizo and rioja/cider to maintain life and well-being, fuerza and cojones.

          My father buys his chorizo in Chorizo Heaven, a little shop and manufacturer in the tiny pueblo of Allo.

          The sight of the chorizos hanging from the beams makes one’s heart sing with joy! To pick your very own from such a cornucopia!

          Let others, with degraded souls and shrivelled hearts, eat offal: chorizo for men! For breakfast! With cognac!

          But there’ s actually a disgusting thing, a vile thing, an abortion, a travesty, not fit to be seen in Hell: ‘chorizo’ Made in Britain…. I cross myself, and shudder.

      • raviuppal4 says:

        Xabier , I agree with you . I am quite surprised at how far the West has heldup inspite of the issues we have discussed here . Still eating blueberries imported from Peru . However when is the tipping point ? Are we flying blind ? Governments have a simple strategy — Deny , delay and then pray it will all go away . We have seen that in Covid . The general public is just to engrossed with scrolling on their smartphones . I look at the math and say no f°°°ing way but still the music plays on in the West . No hardships . On the other hand I look at Asia — Thailand , Phillipines , the Indian subcontinent ( India , Bangladesh , Pakistan , Nepal , Sri Lanka , Afghanistan ) , Africa parts of ME ( Syria, Jordan etc) all in a state of collapse . That is about 50% of the world’s population . I guess survival of the fittest prevails . The collapse begins at the periphery and progresses to the centre — the fish rots from the head down . We knew at the beginning of the war that the SPR was 75-90 days but we had no idea what the exact ” oil on sea ” was . This has allowed BAU till now . Checkout my earlier posts on how the USA is bailing out the ROW . Best estimate is that by end of June / 1st week July this will end ( that is the math) . I may sound doomerish — but I don’t want this party to end . As I have always said — when it ends — my satisfaction will be ” I told you so ” . 😭
        P.S : – My last wish is to have a selfie ” the man in Belgium to buy the last litre of petrol/Diesel ” . 🤣

        • reante says:

          Slowly then all at once.

        • Xabier says:

          The only way to see this, Ravi, is as an absolutely fascinating time to be alive. If one still has a full belly, of course.

          The strong resurgence of flights into London Heathrow has taken me completely by surprise, just like the full shelves, etc.

          To most people, the Iran war is a non-event – but of course it’s not even a newspaper headline here in England.

          No one is prepping (unless ordering online for van delivery ?) and everyone is Happy Motoring. They are are happier than us in their utter ignorance.

          ‘If the fog is hiding a tiger running after you, don’t pray for it to be lifted’.

          Or should that now be: ‘ ‘If there’s something nice on the screen, don’t look up’?

          • Nathanial says:

            Are you sure they are happy? Paying higher prices… lower wages…. Lower value for their currency? I don’t think they are happy they just don’t know the sh&7 storm that is about to hit them in the face…. So they have a stiff upper lip. I was in the gas line in the U.s with my daughter and she made the comment that everyone was out standing with their hands on the pump. I told her that you are supposed to do that; and then I thought this is amurica people do what they want and that’s when I realized that they were doing that because they were not filling up all the way! They are either broke or expecting prices to drop. Big fat women driving giant pickup trucks….how stupid can you be…

          • Fred says:

            I’m prepping (best crop ever of pecans this year) and Happy Motoring. Fire up the ol’ V8 and off to the beach with the top down we go.

            Party on doomers!

      • Fred says:

        Surely you meant say “it’s still BAU party time baby!”

        Get your motor runnin’
        Head out on the highway
        Looking for adventure
        In whatever comes our way

        Yeah, darlin’, go and make it happen
        Take the world in a love embrace
        Fire all of your guns at once
        And explode into space

    • Hubbs says:

      Feel good virtue signaling.

    • runawaywise3f07697399 says:

      Gail I am very leary of ZH, WSJ, Reuters, Axios, Channel 12. Some are worse than others.

      Comments on Sonar 21. The 170 girls welcoming trump at the airport and the message. I think Xi was at the airport when Putin last visited. Xi mentions the Thucydides Trap in his opening statements.

  24. the blame-e says:

    “. . . the underlying problem is that there isn’t enough energy (particularly oil) to support a world population of over eight billion.”

    Actually, researchers in Finland recently said how world population estimates may be off by at least 1-billion people, and probably more.

    This would explain why so much is happening so quickly, most of it being bad.

    • Tim Groves says:

      The Guardian reported that:

      “A groundbreaking study published in March 2025 by researchers at Aalto University in Finland suggests that global population figures—widely estimated at over 8.2 billion—may be missing a significant portion of the rural population, potentially undercounting the true total by hundreds of millions or, by some projections, over a billion people.”

      That would mean that Bill Gates and friends didn’t do a good enough job with vaccines after all.

      But what does it matter, since uncounted people don’t count in economic terms. They tend to live outside the system, off the grid, at subsistence level. Bill Gates and his friends don’t like them because they can’t bill these people for anything and they can’t Gate-keep them. As someone who loves issuing bills and operating gates, Bill Gates probably hates them for their freedoms!

      Per capita energy consumption varies widely between countries, classes, and individuals. For instance, the average total annual energy consumption for people in the Central African Republic, a country smack in the middle of in central Africa, is 286 kWh. For people in Qatar, a country smack in the middle of the Persian Gulf region, it’s 194,222 kWh. This means that the average Qatari consumes as much energy as 679 Central Africans.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_energy_consumption_per_capita

      If there were another billion middle-class first worlders hiding from the statistics somewhere and consuming at first-world middle-class levels, that would be problematic for the system. But another billion living like Central Africans might not make a significant difference as they would only consume the equivalent of what 2 or 3 million OFW readers consume.

      And there is also the theory that China’s population is much much much lower than officially stated.

      • I always wonder how accurate population numbers are. There is a political aspect to population figures. A country will want its numbers to “look good” in some sense. And the cost of doing an accurate census is high. In poor countries, birth and death records may be poor.

        • dobbs says:

          To get a good estimate of the population, statistical surveys are cheaper and more accurate than a full census. I find it really disturbing that we don’t have very good estimates of the population size. This is the simplest most basic social information.

          • x-soviet says:

            Again, when they really start with massive depop, not accounted for rural population should be easier to deal with, numbers wise…
            Doesn’t the newest article above predict the electricity disappearance first in those remote, rural aread first? Interestingly functional coincidence, if so… 😅

            • Loss of electricity in rural areas seems to be likely in the future.

              I live in a suburban area. We had a tree fall in our neighborhood last week, taking down both electricity and internet wires. Electricity was down from 7:00 pm until 5:23am, with various short outages later. Internet was down quite a bit longer. Fortunately, for light use (like responding to comments), a hot spot from my phone was a work around.

              Unfortunately, in an area with a lot of thunderstorms, above ground wiring, and lots of tall trees, falling trees are a never-ending problem. We see roofs with blue tarps, very often, covering up holes in roofs where trees have fallen and put a hole in a roof.

              If it is hard to fix these problems in rural areas, electricity coverage will go downhill quickly.

          • JavaKinetic says:

            Cell phone users. Anyone alive has one by the age of 15. Sure, there are a few who have no need for them… but what is that, 10% of the population?

            Without one, you cannot receive payments in many places. Its a self reinforcing mechanism, and is probably the most accurate means to determine a population in any given area.

            • Retired Librarian says:

              This seems very sensible! I looked & the number for individual cells is 5.9 billion.

            • Quite a few people have two cell phones. One for work and one for personal calls seems to be the pattern.

              Elderly problems in care homes may not have any cell phone. Too difficult to view and operate.

        • I AM THE MOB says:

          There’s way too many people on this planet.

          Hopefully this new virus “Andes” will mow down the population.

      • Mike Jones says:

        What’s a few hundred million among friends? Even a billion …we live in an ever expanding universe….
        Yes, the vaccine scam only made money for big pharma and Bill Gates…Fast Eddy is in exile now for his bad call… you’re all going to die if your poked with it…right…
        Maybe round 2, Bill and his gang will get it 👍 right and put us down without suffering too badly.
        As far as the population goes, don’t bother, it will take care of itself in the self regulating manner Gail likes to bring up.

        PS I’m vaxxed and feel fine…still waiting to die…unlucky me

    • AndreasVienna says:

      Thank you, blame-e and Tim Groves! If i come across the article or even the paper itself (and it’s easily accessible) I’ll post the URL.

  25. ivanislav says:

    Is the US administration sane enough to negotiate an off ramp in Iran from/with China, and stick to it? Or does the war just restart shortly after the China visit?

    • drb753 says:

      I can’t see a logical scenario where the war does not restart.

      • the blame-e says:

        I agree with you. Just like with the Ukraine War (or the Russian SMO), the Iran War will go on with continuous escalations. Escalations, by definition, are provocations. This is why “World War 3 has already started” is a correct statement.

        • Foolish Fitz says:

          I’m generally of the same view, but Seyyed Abbas Araghchi(FM) was received with hugs by Chinese officials and Iran made some interesting announcements on his return, which shows that they are working in tandem. China appears to have the upper hand in just about all areas, so Trump may be offered no more than a slightly less embarrassing way out, because despite his bloviating Trump has a very weak hand.

          I don’t expect him to agree, which leaves the only option being Iran backing down and I’ll let Araghchi’s words at the present BRICS conference answer that

          “I come from an ancient land whose leaders have stood courageously by their people in the pursuit of justice, independence, and the defense of sovereignty and territorial integrity, sacrificing their lives for historic and national ideals.

          I speak for an Iran whose armed forces, medical personnel, schoolteachers, and law enforcement officers never once placed their own safety above saving the lives of those they are duty bound to protect, and served with honor on the front line of humanity.

          I speak for a people which, under horrific bombardment, chose to stand firm; for the mothers of Minab who did not bend under the grief of losing their children; for young people who refuse to let the dust of war erase their bright futures; and for a nation that, despite all pressures, continues to believe in a free, stable, and just world.

          By now, it ought to be clear that Iran is unbreakable and only emerges stronger and more united when under pressure. While ready to fight with everything we have in defense of our freedom and our soil, we are equally ready to pursue and defend diplomacy.

          As I have repeatedly stated, there is no such thing as a military solution to anything related to Iran. We Iranians never bow to any pressure or threat, but we reciprocate the language of respect. As much as our powerful armed forces remain ready to exact devastating retribution on foreign aggressors, my people are peace-loving and do not seek war. We are not the aggressor in this sordid situation, but the aggrieved.

          https://en.mehrnews.com/news/244506/Iranians-to-never-bow-down-to-pressure-or-threat-Araghchi

          The offer is being presented and the world is being reminded exactly who will be at fault if the offer is refused, because as he also made clear, Iran has no intention of backing down and not even China can dictate otherwise, unless Iran’s demands are met(winners privileged).

          • The settlement may need to come in steps. I saw a headline this morning: “Trump Invites China’s Xi to September White House Meeting, Following Beijing Summit.”

        • Hubbs says:

          In WW I, Germany and the Allies were at a standstill and depleted until America entered the war and tipped the balance. If America had not entered, France, Germany and England probably would have signed a peace treaty a year or two earlier, and reparations would have been mooted as there would have been no real victors.

          But once the US entered the war, the Allies gained the upper hand and were able to extract onerous reparations upon Germany, essentially guaranteeing a follow up with WWII.

          In the current situation, I really don’t see an outside third party entering either the Ukraine War or the Iran War as a game changer like the US did in WWI.

          Short of a nuclear exchange, I see these conflicts as waxing and waning until all parties are punched out and a N Korea South Korea type stalemate ensues. The escalations will become more feeble. Maybe one last furious round, but if Iran and Russia survive, then uneasy truce will ensue.

          There simply will not be enough raw materials, energy, or capital to continue in an escalatory fashion.

          • At some point, this has to happen:

            “There simply will not be enough raw materials, energy, or capital to continue in an escalatory fashion.”

            Then fighting will tend to go to a more local level. Higher-level governments will tend to fail. One person will want to grab what another has.

      • The war may restart, but I think that the US bows out. Other Middle Eastern countries are likely to keep shooting at each other, and Europe will keep supplying cheap drones to some of them. Russia may even get more involved, by shooting at Europe. But this will to be a Eurasian war, rather than a world war.

      • edpell3 says:

        We must secure Greater Israel and kill dangerous Muslims, that is Iran and Turkiye. We must steal the enriched uranium from Iran. The dying and ill will must be placed on America.

  26. raviuppal4 says:

    The United States has released 80 million of the 172 million barrels it pledged under the IEA 400 million barrel strategic storage release program. The US portion of this release is now averaging about 1.4 million barrels per day, which explains why the Donald is bragging so loudly about “booming” US exports.

    To wit, US crude oil exports were averaging about 3.9 million barrels per day in January 2026 on a pre-war basis. During the last four weeks, however, that figure has surged to an average of 5.3 million barrels per day.

    Q.E.D. Virtually the entire daily export gain is not the result of rising US production, but amounts to a one-time sale of US government strategic oil stocks to the highest bidders on the global market. In effect, that’s why all the oil tankers are being re-routed toward the Gulf Coast per the Donald’s clueless late night social media posts.

    Of course, none of this is organic or sustainable or an indication that the Donald has “all the time in the world” to figure out an off-ramp from a cockamamie war that he has already essentially lost. In fact, if full Persian Gulf production and export levels are not re-established soon, the global economy, American voters and most especially the Donald will be experiencing a Wile E. Coyote event in global energy and commodity markets about, say, the first week of November.

  27. MG says:

    No passive income. What starts as an innocent rental can turn into an expensive endeavor

    “A long-standing source of high income is drying up under the pressure of travelers’ expectations, high management costs, and government regulations

    Short-term rentals have a reputation as an investment where money practically makes itself. They offer double-digit returns, a downtown apartment, or a mobile app. In comparison, a traditional rental arrangement seems like a cop-out—a 4% guarantee and no late-night phone calls or battles over reviews. In the eyes of aggressive investors, it’s almost a cowardly choice.

    But the professional hotel business exacts its own toll. The bill usually comes due for inexperienced landlords when the decision can no longer be reversed. It most often manifests in hidden costs. The expectations of the modern traveler and the limitations of the small business owner subsequently erode the margin that looked irresistible on paper.”

    Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

    https://www.trend.sk/biznis/ziaden-pasivny-prijem-z-nevinneho-prenajmu-moze-vzist-draha-zabava?itm_modul=react_trend_topbox&itm_brand=trend&itm_template=hp&itm_position=1&itm_cb_position=top_main_1

    • I think that this is becoming a problem in the US. I know of a couple of homes in my neighborhood that have, in the past, been short term rentals, but they are mostly empty now. With high gasoline prices, people are not inclined to make as many trips. And the market has become over-filled with people wanting to make money.

      People were hoping that property appreciation would help them out, but with higher interest rates, this isn’t as likely either.

    • I see this near the top:

      “The prohibition on sugar exports comes a day after the government hiked import duty on gold and other precious metals as a measure to curb non-essential imports and protect foreign exchange. The government is undertaking a series of measures to ensure energy availability and essential supplies in the country.”

      This type of action will tend to keep the price of gold and other precious metals down. It will tend to raise the price of sugar to the rest of the world.

      I know that the US has been using a whole lot of sugar and corn syrup, with corn syrup being cheaper. We can hope that the production of sweet products will fall, but maybe the result will be more that corn syrup is substituted for sugar.

  28. MG says:

    It is an interesting paradox, but diesel car sales go up in Czech Republic:

    https://auto.pravda.sk/magazin/clanok/805527-fabia-az-siesta-rastu-diesle-toto-su-najpredavanejsie-auta-v-cesku/

    “The Czech market for new passenger cars saw a slight increase in the first quarter, mainly due to corporate orders. Interest in SUVs remains strong, and demand for diesel cars has surprisingly risen. Electric cars are still on the periphery of consumer interest.”

    • reante says:

      x-?

      • x-soviet says:

        Unlike continental India-originated “Slovakians”, the Czechs are shrewd, hard-working, largely ethical people with disdain for impoverished communal “tabor” living, Russian “civilisation” and Communism in general.
        I’m sure, it was discussed on this very Portal into oblivion during the years (decades?) past, but just in case (Repetition is the Mother of Learning, etc etc):
        https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/properties
        (specifically, see the “Energy Comparison” row there – traditional, Low Sulfur Biodiesel has ~13% more energy per volume unit, than, for example, GGE, and, conversely, GGE has ~12% less energy per volume unit, than DGE. Please see the de-abbreviations in the table).
        Fully electric car’s batteries have ridiculously low energy density. Also, electricity has to be produced somewhere, transported over long distances (with all those highly lossy steps ups and downs) and then lossily stored in the low energy density car batteries of today.

        • The (s-)appeal of PHEV or EVs chiefly focused in the local charging be it PV / small hydro / whatever.. !
          ( and or off peak grid tariffs )

          Interestingly, seems you self-refuted there on the very ” communal ” approach as linking EVs with ” state ” grid hah.

          It’s funny to be obsessed with EV batt. low energy density when avg* distance traveled per day is minuscule – way bellow the typical EV range or mostly adequate to PHEVs batt. sizing anyway.


          * meaning private passenger fleet out there

        • reante says:

          Thanks for that cultural distinction. the Czech Ivan Lendl was my favorite tennis player as a boy even despite the glorious game of the Swede Stefan Edberg’s being in the world. When I lived in Manhattan as a boy I also had a Czech soccer coach for a couple years who I really loved. He was a cool dude, 40s, we all looked up to him and junior high school kids don’t do a whole lot of looking up to anybody. His name was Ves when he said it but we all called him Wes.

    • I would imagine that the number of electricity charging stations is near zero in the Czech Republic. I remember reading that Chinese “electric cars” are mostly dual engine cars, so that buyers can charge at home for short trips, and use petroleum for longer trips because of a similar issue.

      In rich countries, electric cars are often secondary cars to petroleum-powered cars. Electric cars are for short trips around town; petroleum cars are used for longer-distance trips. But this is in two-car households. I would expect that in the Czech Republic, most households have only one car. With only one car, whatever is made locally, which probably is diesel-powered, would be the choice.

      I have a hard time seeing that it will be possible to maintain a large network of charging stations, anywhere. If nothing else, the theft of copper is enticing. And the cost of round the clock attendants becomes impossibly high.

      • Yes, CHN ventured into PHEVs bigly in recent years, but this is mostly for exports, domestically they are pursuing more full EVs doctrine though.

        The fun part being, the western ~inferior products still continue to rule in terms of [ ” I want it all ” ] segment / attitude, i.e. as the CHN refuse to produce such combo what is demanded: all wheel drive in elevated ground clearance and with decent batt. capacity say +25kWh.

        Hence, that’s why even after many yrs the output quality problematic Jeep is still the best PHEV out there, perhaps alongside the ~Brits should they decide to electrify the Ineos brand eventually, and few JAP if you disregard theirs non existent towing potential.

        The best PHEV deal for money currently from CHN as in SUV framesize and ft. some ground clearance are ” MG HS ” and ” S9 ” models – almost at 1/2 price of the W. competition, but as alluded above it’s FWD only.. so a deal breaker for many..

        The German production be it Spanish, Czech, Slovak, Polish sub brand provenience (manuf) are comparatively very expensive vs CHN, and their AWD potential is ephemeral anywayz, so we are always back to that intro point.

      • Fred says:

        Best use case for EVs is to have your own, large solar system and charge at home. Small EVs are about the cheapest new cars available in Australia.

        Battery range is limited, but enough for >90% of usage.

        Also a cheap way of boosting domestic battery storage, as many EVs now do V2H.

        Get yourself an early 2000s (before cars got too complicated) clunker for longer trips. Find a good one and they’ll last for several years. Chuck it away when it breaks and get another.

        Or get yourself a pre-96 Toyota or similar and put it on classic rego, which costs almost nothing here.

        • Yes, in Australia EV/PHEVs must have been the way to go for large segment of pop for some time already. Also the pricetag is surely a notch better vs say EU/US.

          Noticed you get there electric pickups already say from GWM and JAC – way better than say US or Korean brands.. Not sure these beauties will ever get to EU though.

  29. Tim Groves says:

    This is a bit on the long side, but I am reproducing it in full for those who don’t want to be bothered to click the link. But please do click the link and like and subscribe to Alex Krainer’s Substack if you are so inclined. He doesn’t post there very often so you won’t be inundated.

    The sheer Malthusian Machiavellian Orwellian dystopianism of the fiendishly ghastly ghouls behind the curtain is mind-bogglingly and blood-curdlingly evil.

    Racing toward “Absolute Zero”
    It’s very real: the Epstein class is dead serious about ‘getting rid of the poor people,’ and creating an Orwellian totalitarian society.
    ALEX KRAINER
    MAY 13

    Last week, a British farmer reported that he received a letter from the government, informing him that,

    “… by 2030, there is to be a 50% reduction in farmed animals. And by 2050, 100% – zero farm animals systems in place. And guess who’s signed up to that? Yes, the two biggest arseholes in the world: Starmer and Bill Gates. What more proof do I want, and I’ve got it in writing. So it looks like their little takeover is coming along nicely for them, but unfortunately we’ve now got the document. So… let World War 4 commence. We don’t need to be at war with Russia, we’re going to create our internal one.”

    This is one farmer’s statement, but there’s a lot to unpack here. Assuming that the letter he received is real, demanding reducing animal farming by 50% over the next four years, we must ask the obvious question: why? Why would his government mandate such an unreasonable, destructive measure? Why would any government mandate that?

    Absolute zero

    For answers, we need to revisit a major policy paper, titled “Absolute Zero,” which was published on 29 November 2019 in collaboration between the universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and the Imperial College of London, and funded by UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). “Absolute Zero” lays out the strategy of reaching zero carbon emissions in accordance with the UK Climate Change Act of 2008. It states that the public will have to cease all activity that causes emissions:

    “In addition to reducing our energy demand, delivering zero emissions with today’s technologies requires the phasing out of flying, shipping, lamb and beef, blast furnace steel and cement.“

    Therefore, the consumption of beef and lamb must drop by 50%. By 2050 it will be “phased out.” The deranged ivory tower social engineers who authored “Absolute Zero” go well beyond dictating what the farmers may cultivate and what we may eat. They also recommended that all airports in the UK must close by 2029, only excluding Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast airports.

    These three airports may stay open, but only on condition that transfers to and from the airports are all done via rail. Even so, all airports must then close by 2050. From that year on, every citizen of the UK must “stop using airplanes,” which very much sounds like a feudal agenda of fixing people in place. And it will have to be an old place since all construction of new buildings must also cease by 2050.

    Back in November 2019, “Absolute Zero” may have appeared like loony musings of an idle academics with too much free time in their sinecures. It was not: the agenda they formulated had and still has the full support and commitment of the British government. In addition to the said Climate Change Act, in April 2021 British government explicitly committed to the objective of slashing carbon emissions by 78% by 2035, in line with the recommendations of some “independent Climate Change Committee.” UK government’s official press release announcing this new law, including supportive platitudes from Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, is a truly harrowing read.

    Inducing behavioral changes

    The deranged Absolute Zero academics did anticipate resistance to their agenda from the lowly masses, so they touched upon the behavioral measures that will be necessary:

    “The changes in behaviour to achieve Absolute Zero are clearly substantial. In principle, these changes could be induced through changing prices and thus providing clear incentives for behaviour to change. The alternative is that the government prohibits certain types of behaviour and regulates production processes.”

    Evidently, those who set the agenda understand that they must achieve their objectives against the will of the people and that the changes in people’s behavior must “be induced.” The letter which our farmer recently received suggests that the government opted for “the alternative:” to prohibit certain types of behaviour and regulate production processes.

    Wars and lockdowns

    In light of all this, it is fair to ask whether the new round of lockdowns which could be foisted upon us over the Hantavirus are also part of “prohibiting certain types of behaviour?” What about the war drive? European politicians are talking about a war against Russia as “inevitable” by 2030. Is the destabilization of energy markets and the destruction of energy facilities around the world also part of this same agenda, aimed at creating “clear incentives for behaviour” through higher energy prices?

    What kind of future are these “experts” planning for us and our children? And if we resist the “behaviour changes” that they seek to induce, then what? Will we be designated as domestic terrorists? In view of all this, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the restrictions, regulations, disruptions and wars are all means of reaching the same end: an all-out war against the people. It could be their solution to the problem of how to “get rid of the poor people,” as Jeffrey Epstein apparently discussed with our health and climate superhero Bill Gates, as per the Epstein files.

    Recall, in 2011, Hollywood producer Barry Josephson wrote to Jeffrey Epstein as follows:

    “I’ve been thinking a lot about that question that you [Jeffrey Epstein] asked Bill Gates, ‘how do we get rid of poor people as a whole,’ and I have an answer/comment regarding that for you.”

    Today we know that Epstein, who represented the Rothschild banking dynasty, and Gates collaborated extensively. Their collaboration included work on planning pandemics and developing vaccines. Gates even publicly mused about reducing the population through vaccination programs and “reproductive health.”

    Gates and Absolute Zero

    The British farmer who informed us that he is to reduce his herd by 50% over the next four years, said that the letter he received was signed by Bill Gates. That might sound incredible, but it shouldn’t. The British government has a long standing partnership with Gates and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, primarily through the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) and Department of Health and Social Care.

    Their collaboration entailed high-level meetings and policy discussions on global health, vaccines, climate change, clean energy, and international development. The Gates Foundation opened an office in London in 2010 to facilitate this work. On 17 October 2024, after barely three months in office, Prime Minister Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves held a meeting with Gates and his foundation’s CEO Mark Suzman at 10 Downing Street.

    On the occasion, they they discussed climate change, global health and vaccines, as well as development opportunities for Bill Gates’ nuclear power company, TerrorPower TerraPower. This wasn’t the first meeting between Gates and Starmer; somehow, Gates knew to cultivate Sir Keir well before he was Prime Minister. They already met in UK Parliament in October 2022 to discuss climate change, global health, and yes, the net zero goals. For all we knew, that may have been Starmer’s job interview.

    It does appear that Mr. Gates, British political and academic establishment and the rest of the Epstein class are deadly serious about forging a dystopian, 1984-like new society where they will decide what we may eat and how much, where we can travel and when, and how we live. They also understand that the 99.9% will resist and are clearly determined to tackle our resistance through brainwash and prohibitions of undesirable behaviors. This gives the 99.9% no choice but, as our farmer put it, World War IV.

    https://alexkrainer.substack.com/p/racing-toward-absolute-zero

    • edpell3 says:

      Happily China, Africa, and South Anerica are not on board.

      • edpell3 says:

        India has so little that it is already below all limits proposed for the rich areas.

        • guest says:

          And India is considered a 1st world country compared to most African countries.

          There’s a reason no one ever talks about carbon dioxide emissions from the continent of Africa.

    • adonis says:

      This is the plan because Vegan food can feed all of us animal based food uses too many resources it sounds horrible being forced to eat vegan when you have been used to an animal based diet all your life but what choices have we got. We saw how the pandemic played out no sane person wanted the jab . The pandemic was Plan A it was de-population by simply being vaccinated continuously until you die luckily that plan failed. Now we go to Plan B which is “THE GREAT RESET” this means vegan food taking over the food supply elimination of oil-guzzling activities such as flying commuting to work with oil-guzzling cars taking your children too school with a car that burns petrol big changes are coming are you ready or are you going to fight Plan B. Be aware that if Plan B fails then plan C will be activated which will probably be Plan A but on steroids.

      • I AM THE MOB says:

        Fun fact: having a plan B makes you more likely to fail plan A.

      • Some-most but not all animal based diet key ingredients could be sourced cleverly in vegan diet as well. So in extreme model simplification lets say ~[ 90% vegan + 10% animal ] is achievable for ~full human dev potential ~easily.

        We have discussed the details over the yrs/decades over here enough, basically it means the end of regular (merely habitual ) meat gorging the majority of pop in some locales got accustomed to.

        • the blame-e says:

          “. . . regular (merely habitual ) meat gorging the majority . . .”

          Not too biased are we?

          • The meat gorging is evidently momentarily phenomenon of past opulent decades and ~two industrial centuries. It rhymes with the taking over the US/CAN prairies in 19th century, plus similar effort in S. America, and Australia..

            In previous centuries/millennia – the beef segment intake diet per pop was rather limited and largest part took from the ~lesser meat quality in dairy cattle anyway. Which in today’s craziness often/sometimes ends up in livestock carcass incinerators.. simply no takers for the stuff.

            So, in other words your line of argumentation seem to reveal the extra bias in the first place.

            Perhaps you perceived the proverbial well marbled steak as divine everlasting right, and that’s not mine problem.

            In terms of meat, human-oids are doing perfectly well on subtle mix of diverse poultry, fish and bit of pig meat. These giga cattle orgies are redundant recent over-addition only..

            • Xabier says:

              What tripe! (Pun intended).

              While steak-on-demand is of course a transient Oil-Age phenomenon, you are offering a caricature of historic common-person diets, which spanned a very wide spectrum.

              How about the wild Welsh of the 12thc, who were more or less pastoralists, and who Gerald of Wales described thus:

              ‘They have plenty of meat to eat (beef, lamb, goat, pig), cheese and milk in plenty; small of stature perhaps but ferocious and strong in battle’.

              The Technocrat advocates of the impoverished – industrially-produced, highly-processed – Vegan diet which they intend to force on us know what they are about.

              Veganism is preposterous as a foundation for health and strength unless you seek an enfeebled population, eating muck on which you own the patents and the factories it is made in. Then it is ideal.

              Even in the 19thc, the nadir of the diet of rural labourers in England, workers living on a good farm were given, as of right, thick slices of beef twice a week, Thursday and Sunday, the origin of the working-class ‘Sunday Roast’. The rest of the week, thick slices of fatty bacon every day. As their master ate, so did they.

              God Bless Merrie England!

            • You are jumping up to a wrong signal-thread. There’s no support for industrialist food in that post to begin with. Perhaps you missed the recent ~vegan debate under previous article concerning the micro-nutrients, how to unlock, keep them etc.

              Surely, I could have written it even more clearly. But as stressed enough it is apparent that traditional pastoralists were structurally NOT able to run high discrepancy ratio between dairy and meat breeds.. as we have today.

              Besides the late middle ages were perhaps the early lift-off phase for today’s problems to begin with. Overpop mega trend spike, psychotic $money focused urban classes running everything incl. ( rent seeking ) tentacles to food provisioning in the country-side etc.

            • Itrustmydog says:

              There was plenty of energy per capita back then not just oil.

              I try to eat a couple square inches of meat every day. Mostly mackerel. That goes up with heavy labor. Be loving the kefir.

            • Fish is a whole lot better for people than land animals. Fish that comes from the ocean or rivers is better than farmed fish that is filled with antibiotics and all kinds of other things.

              Land animals in the US are fed with the left-overs from corn after the part of the corn that is needed to make ethanol is taken out. The left over are called dried distillers grains (DDGs). DDGs are not very good for the animals, leading to a need for antibiotics and other drugs.

              https://ethanol.nebraska.gov/for-ethanol-producers/co-products.html

              The above link says:

              On average, 1 bushel of corn (56 pounds) provides 2.9 gallons of fuel ethanol, 15.1 pounds of distillers grains for animal feed, 0.9 pounds of corn oil, and 16 pounds of captured biogenic CO2 from ethanol production.

              The CO2 is used for carbonating beverages, among other things.

      • the blame-e says:

        Being run out of options was always the plan. It’s like how corporate oligarchies justified the destruction of the world’s greatest economy in history back in the 1970s.
        “Do you want your stuff made more expensively here in the United States, or less expensively (and made more cheaply) in places like China and India?”

    • reante says:

      Agenda 2030 controlled opposition psyop which is a rebranding of the plandemic-era Great Reset psyop.

    • Well, the key missing puzzle out of this picture is the grand energy shift.
      We know CHN cracked the thorium reactor question already, hence ” unlimited ” energy supply via legacy grid and NPP sites ( the new reactor could be hooked to existing steam – grid generator ); RU and eventually w. delay US will have it too..

      Now, the conundrum is do we enter the new era with this elevated global pop levels or trimmed-adjusted one ? Some factions are deliberately working for the latter scenario.. not only because of the protracted phase-in nature of any brake-through technology in decades, but in their view such pop levels are ” not needed ” anymore.

    • raviuppal4 says:

      Failed in NL 2022 . Rutte lost the election on this issue .
      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/22/thousands-of-dutch-farmers-protest-against-emissions-targets

    • postkey says:

      ” . . . population growth is a prerequisite for modernity, because the complexity of extraction technologies must grow to sustain flows of non-renewable resources as the quality of their reserves declines, and growing populations are necessary to make advanced technology feasible and economic.” ?
      https://un-denial.com/2026/03/22/cactus-challenges/

    • David says:

      I don’t believe he got an official-type letter signed by William Gates III. Surely a spoof? If not a spoof, get it published widely.

    • Fred says:

      Mike Adams at Natural News regularly publishes on the depopulation agenda e.g. https://www.brighteon.com/973c3541-7544-4516-b298-6d143898abfc

      He’s alarmist for sure, but often on the right track.

      The situation we’re in has happened to umpteen great civilisations before us and is normal, given that human nature hardly changes.

      Exactly how will we collapse? Who knows, don’t worry, chill and enjoy the ride, it’s still BAU party time.

  30. Itrustmydog says:

    JPM base is June 1 opening of strait.
    Back to before June 1.
    They are smarter than that.
    This is crowd control.
    IMO we will be getting a decent taste what’s up in July.
    Involuntary reduction in oil consumption will have to occur in July. – Aug.

    • We will know more in July. My guess is that “empty shelves” will be part of the problem. Some products we expected won’t be available. I am wondering if exports from India will be down, for example. Airlines will have pared down schedules.

      • Itrustmydog says:

        How true Gail. No one knows the future. As we say. Tonight…BAU!

        Quite the reception for T in China. Not quite the equivalent of Ts first visit but it blows away the show XI got in Frisco.

        Meashiemer is saying return to military action is unlikely. A deal will be cut when the economic pain grows.. So he shares your optimism Gail.

        • This is the latest Mearshimer video.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCUzMPfGuZY

          Prof John Mearsheimer TRUMP WILL BE FORCED TO CUT A DEAL w/IRAN

          • drb753 says:

            what kind of deal can it be? I think Iran will be forced to close US bases, until then no end of war.

            • Itrustmydog says:

              The bases are gone. They are under enemy fire control. You ain’t gonna put new assets there. .Iran ain’t worried about those bases.

              The deal would be dust goes to Russia. Iran keeps enrichment . New JCPOA. Strait is Irans.

              Trump before road trip. “All I care about is Iran doesn’t get a nuclear weapon. I don’t care about the financial”

              That is Trump’s out. There was a price but Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. Victory!

              Actually now would be a good time for T riding the wave of the “successful” “friendly” and “diplomatic” road trip.

      • the blame-e says:

        I have been seeing the widening of isles at the grocery store I shop in. The last time this happened was during the COVID Lockdowns. This is usually an indication of shortages.

      • postkey says:

        In one supermarket: no tinned salmon, no tomato puree!

        • Meant as you suspect delivery-order shortages per given super-market chain / locale or rather proactive shopper’s assault starting about now ?

          Could be related to some parts of fishing flotillas for North Sea realm now in stand-by; also there is apparently ongoing ecocide ( from previous over fishing ) of this fish in Northern Atlantic as factor to boot.

          Also the effect of coldish start of the year, hence farmers not keen on $heating up greenhouses so late in season.. tomatoes spiking up in price, not sure about it as shops still seems overflowed with it..

          PS also perhaps just some unrelated mishap, as you know the s-markets tend to run these quasi promotion sales per given items say each ~2-3rd week, so you have to wait for particular item to appear on sale.. and sometimes theirs re-stocking effort does not pan out even in normal times..

    • raviuppal4 says:

      Checkout my earlier post . S&P says nothing comes out from SoH before 7 months from opening . Maybe Gail can find it and re post .

  31. Rodster says:

    Art Berman’s take is that the outcome of the Iran war is going to force people to use a lot less energy. The question is, was this done on purpose as we humans have outgrown the petri-dish or is this just another cyclical stain of human history.

    • If prices actually go up and stay up, as Art says, it will also encourage the use of higher-cost extra extraction techniques. Production may not go down as rapidly as we expect. There are a lot of unknowns.

      • reante says:

        That contention of Art’s, then, means he has further journeying to do into the nature of demand destruction. Demand destruction is not a steady state. You can’t just offset it monetarily because of the debt dynamics.

        No hgher-cost extraction of energy is possible from here on out, even with the real value of energy now relentlessly and terminally rising. Higher-cost extraction at relevant scale only exists during the growth phase. The small amount of fracking increase we’re currently seeing is just a statistical noise of this Big Nuclear Scare crackup boom phase change.

        • raviuppal4 says:

          ” No hgher-cost extraction of energy is possible from here on out, even with the real value of energy now relentlessly and terminally rising. ”
          Agree 100% .

          • drb753 says:

            China of course is doing just that.

            • reante says:

              An explanation accompanying that claim would have been good unless it was a Kevin Walmsley link.

            • I guess large part of it is different approach to energy expense given their relatively recent near starving existence. In other words they tend to waste system-wise way less energy per economic output ( and per person! ) in comparison to West / RoW. And that’s what chiefly propelled their $accumulation in broader sense achieved over-all prosperity after such short run..

              If we trivialize – it’s the trans regional bullet train going to metro station vs. greyhoundbus ( or airport w. parking lot at the city outskirts )..

            • drb753 says:

              solar and wind are higher cost. I am on the fence re: thorium and sCO2, but they are high cost right now. You could even make a case that EVs are higher cost, and they dominate that sector, incidentally also producing two generations of totally different batteries compared to what EVs started with.

              Perhaps you ought to also find out how many uranium based NPP they are building, but that is a bit of cheating because nuclear is uniquely expensive in the US but not elsewhere. It’s like you don’t know anything about China.

            • Drb> not sure to whom you replied.

              But, in terms of NPPs and that has been mentioned over-here numerous times already:

              – the realistic life-span of contemporary NPP is at least ~60yrs, obviously providing cont. upkeep etc.

              – at least two countries ( RU and CHN ) are able now to use breeder facilities to unlock more energy from existing “spent” fuel pellets

              – NPP as site could be anytime chopped off at the generator hall and the reactor part switched to whatever new comes around – say now confirmed successes in thorium reactors.. , all done on pre-existing grid connected site – aka huge savings.. vs say new coal mine province or giant water-dam..

              – PV / Wind – CHN saw the gigantic long term subsidies issued in EU/US.. so they jumped to the occasion – yes mostly foolish in that wind sector as the blade recycling is impossible as of now..

              PS don’t agree with the claim nuclear is much cheaper in RoW, it’s still a large expense in local moneyz / budget .. yes slightly better vs US situation..

              EV batteries 2gen are you kidding? Well now rather at something like ~10-20th generation and branching offshoots..
              Just quickly some of the ~recent milestones and much more along the way: lead acid batt. / up to AGM, NiCd, NiMH, Li-ion, LTO, Li-NMC, LiFEPO4, ..

            • reante says:

              Apples to oranges. Those are unsustainable higher cost legacy investments of the Everything Bubble. Inertia maintained from the growth phase and on into the post- plandemic several years by significantly or catastrophically diluting the incomes of 90+PC of the people on the planet in order to fund those bubbles.

              Don’t get me wrong, such gargantuan top-down Phase 1 catabolic collapse malinvestment is what has to happen in order for the permanent perversions of Global Fascism to persist for several more years post-growth and post- plandemic, which in turn keeps the die-off at arm’s length, but myself I certainly don’t view that as anything to brag about. But you’re a wealthy man who frequently enjoys his jet fuel so YMMV.

            • drb753 says:

              Jr, perhaps I should have said “mass produced batteries”. In Italy, they are coming in with the third version in 2026. In China I am sure they are farther along. They are completely dependent on the USA as you can see.

        • Low prices for producers seems to be what usually cuts off extraction. Investment stops or greatly slows down. This is the bottleneck we should expect again.

      • the blame-e says:

        You’re right, Gail. Prices go up permanently, as does downsizing. My 16-ounce box of cereal is now down to 12 ounces. The house my parents paid $23,000 for in 1962, was listed for well over $500,000 in 2006. Property taxes in 1962 (including school taxes) were $800.00. The house I paid $156,000 for in 2000 was back on the market for over $600,000 in 2016. I want to say none of this is sustainable, but nothing has changed in the 70-years I have been on the planet. Prices only go up.

  32. runawaywise3f07697399 says:

    You might want to stock up on lubricants:

    https://x.com/merlinscapital/status/2054386969187058140/photo/1

    • There may indeed be shortages of products we look for, like lubricants. The empty shelf problem coming back.

      • Nathanial says:

        How do you think the meeting with China will smooth things out?!?? Trump has repeatedly made racial comments towards China over the years and on top of that he is the most dishonest man on the planet! Who would trust or believe anything that comes out of his mouth?!? I get it that you have grandchildren; I have children too but the fact is we are heading towards a brick wall at about 80 miles an hour

        • reante says:

          Nat taking up Demiurge’s losing battle against Gail’s human Dunbar Number. Adaptation is largely about not fighting losing battles. As Gail wisely said last month — and I paraphrase — values change in accordance with ecological change. Another way of putting that is, adaptive cultural values are always ecological.

          Collapse is radical ecological change.

          Political summits are the diplomatic height of political theater, but they do serve as vehicles for focusing on Silent Diplomacy, and Silent Diplomacy in the age of Collapse is how State bureaucracies formalize the cooperative Non-Public Degrowth Agenda.

          • Nathanial says:

            Again… do you re read what you write? I suggest that you take up that habit. I’m merely stating that the orange man is an idiot with diplomatic skills about the size of yours. I am not expecting much from this meeting at all except Trump gallivanting saying he is the GOAT! Similarities between you and him abound! Also you don’t need to reply as I have been skipping your word salads.

            • reante says:

              That’s not all that you stated. Fathers need to learn to take responsibility for their actions.

        • Something will work out so we don’t hit a brick wall at 80 miles an hour. Everyone looks out for their own self-interest. Somehow, the system will help us. If enough people in Asia object to the Iranian War, there is a reasonable chance an off-ramp can be found.

          • raviuppal4 says:

            TPTB are not worried about the protests . Nothing stopped GWB from doing Iraq war II inspite of protests .

  33. As the Hordes are knocking at the door of the Garden, the days of the ne’erdowells of United Kingdom and Rednecks of USA are going to end with a bang.

    I am not wasting words on the ‘minorities’ and will spare words on them, other than saying that it will be quite nasty.

    However the lower classes of the more advanced countries will be kicked back to penury. They continued to be animalistic, unrepentant and still enjoying lavish lifestyles, and they will be the first to enjoy privation.

    The rich won’t do too badly since they have enough ‘cushion’ to fall back, but the English-speaking animals in the Five Eyes will fall back to the lifestyles of alley rats of the victorian era.

    • TIm Groves says:

      The urchins are writhing around in the mud
      Like eels playing tag in a barrel
      The old Sally Army sound mournful and sweet
      As they play an old Christmassy carol
      The world is as black as a dark night in hell
      What kind of a place can this be?
      Old people like hermit crabs run into doorways
      Fearing to say, do you feel as downtrodden as me?

      [Chorus]
      Ting-a-ling, ting-a-ling
      The Devil he leans on your bell
      The future looks black as before
      And the sun never shines, the sun never shines on the poor

      The rich man he dreams of his gold and his plate
      And his house and his car and his women
      The poor man he dreams of his one-roomed estate
      And his wage-packet short by one shilling
      The last penny falls through a hole in your jeans
      Now ain’t that the way when you’re down?
      Just walking in circles for the rest of your life
      And feeling so low that your chin scrapes along on the ground

      Now some of the people are poor in the purse
      They don’t have the cash at the ready
      And some of the people they’re crippled and lame
      They can never stand up true and steady
      And some of the people they’re poor in the head
      Like the simpleton fools that you see
      But most of the people they’re poor in the heart
      It’s the worst kind of poor, it’s the worse kind of poor you can be

    • That seems to be a possibility. There is always the survival of the “best adapted” at the current time. That seems to correspond with the ones who are doing fairly well in the economy.

    • Retired Librarian says:

      You are a wretched man. Perhaps my Redneck relatives will eat you.

    • x-soviet says:

      Amen to that!

  34. Jeep brand owner Stellantis about to jettison some of its under utilized car plants in Europe ( chiefly .IT ) – hence leaving space for CHN’s BYD moving there with its EV production for the +region. So, they will likely axe some of the not selling models perhaps even those stamp-branded (not designed) Jeep econoboxes as well..

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/byd-talks-stellantis-others-taking-082406980.html

    • The economy is to a significant extent self-healing. If there is a possibility that a good deal can be arranged in Europe and somehow fuel can go to Europe in sufficient quantity, China will invest there. If BYD figures out this won’t work, it will pull back fairly quickly, I expect.

      • Supposedly, there is large consumer demand for entry level EUR25k price bracket EVs, which traditional-local brands are not so keen to work with..( low profit margin for them / prefer more that >35k segment though ). While BYD a quasi budget brand could perhaps even relocate some of their CHN based legacy EV assembly lines to Italy now ( vacancies in former Fiat-Jeep factories as per article ) and get some CHN govs incentives to refurbish these home factories for the nextgen production in CHN again in doing so on top of it.

        In any case large pool of formerly powered diesel carz has been erased from Europe in recent yrs and decades and it was clearly bottom down action-mandate effort. Plus monstrosities as super low displacement gasoline engines .8 – 1 – 1.2liters now even fitted with with 12V-48V basic hybrid aka desperation fuel saving campaign in vogue apparently, masquerading behind emission targets goals.

  35. Pingback: The Bulletin: May 6-12, 2026 – Olduvai.ca

  36. Rodster says:

    Berman’s latest: “The Price Isn’t Right: Fundamentals Don’t Support $100 Oil”

    Excerpt: In other words, markets may be concluding that the global economy breaks before the oil system does.

    https://www.artberman.com/blog/the-price-isnt-right-fundamentals-dont-support-100-oil/

    • Nathanial says:

      “Critics may argue that both physical and futures markets are still underpricing risk. Perhaps they are. But the collapse in the physical premium suggests markets increasingly expect some combination of demand destruction, adaptation, rerouting, recession, or diplomacy to ease supply pressure before the system reaches outright physical depletion.”
      This is an excerpt from Art Berman’s essay. The problem I see with it is that even if there was some sort of diplomacy tomorrow, we are still going to see massive shortages of oil. I think the markets are delusional or they are being manipulated. The markets have always been afraid to price oil at its real value, and I don’t know why that is.

      • We don’t understand how different reactions to a given oil price are in different parts of the world. The poor countries of the world are priced out very early. The loss of supply going to these countries keeps the supply up for the rest of the world, and the prices down.

    • reante says:

      Excellent post by Art. Long ass Challah Bread Ceasefire in service of demand destruction. Borrrr-ing! I made the same exact point here several weeks ago about the real cost of $100 dollar oil to countries with broken ass currencies, though I think he’s underestimating that real cost range:

      “My suspicion is that the mechanism is primarily demand destruction. Some will argue that $105 Brent is not high enough for demand destruction to matter materially. I disagree.

      For Pakistan, Egypt, parts of Africa, Southeast Asia, and import-dependent economies in Latin America, $105 Brent combined with currency weakness can feel more like $130–150 oil did in earlier cycles. Markets increasingly appear to recognize that demand destruction arrives before absolute physical exhaustion. The first participants forced out of the market are not wealthy American consumers. They are fertilizer buyers in Africa, trucking firms in Pakistan, factories in Bangladesh, and households across import-dependent economies.

      In other words, markets may be concluding that the global economy breaks before the oil system does.”

      • raviuppal4 says:

        Please note .

        REFINERIES REDUCING THROUGHPUT DUE TO LACK OF CRUDE IS NOT DEMAND DESTRUCTION.

          • raviuppal4 says:

            EIA says there will be glut in 2027 . They never get tired . Energy Inaccuracy Agency ( EIA) ;
            https://rayonegro.substack.com/p/el-ano-que-viene-nos-va-a-salir-el

            • raviuppal4 says:

              JH
              @CRUDEOIL231
              ·
              May 11
              Even without adjusting the Y-axis, it’s clear something is brewing with refined products.

              Global CPP on water is currently plunging over 5mb/d. That is an absolutely insane number.

              And we’re heading straight into the seasonal demand peak. Good luck to everyone!
              https://x.com/CRUDEOIL231/status/2053858570236776620/photo/1

            • Nathanial says:

              Thanks Ravi,
              This meme of everything is fine for the rich white countries but sucks for the poor countries is tiresome. Yes they will suffer more initially but it will eventually hit all countries.

            • Every time in the past that prices have spiked to high levels, they did not stay there very long. It took a lot of work (and QE and 0% interest rates) to keep oil prices up in the 2011 to 2013 period.

              We perhaps should not be shocked if a price shock leads to a huge amount of demand being priced out (mostly in poor countries, but also in budget airlines, for example). It is quite possible that a glut results and falling prices.

            • Itrustmydog says:

              79? Prices doubled and stayed there till 86 when Saudi started pumping like a fool. 79 was a 5; percent reduction in global supply not a 25 percent.

              COVID demand destruction was only 9 percent. They will have to lockdown very hard to get a demand destruction equal to 25 percent supply reduction.

            • Al-ready happening in some locales, e.g. here fishermen in Java, their boats are diesel powered..

              Now, supposedly ~1/4 drop in their activity from that fuel price spike..
              Claiming few hundreds out of ~1600 all ships there.

              ” Hundreds of fishermen in an Indonesian coastal town on the island of Java have been forced to stop going out to sea because of rising diesel … ”

              (h)ttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/0viUD3MtC3I

              https://ca.news.yahoo.com/diesel-price-surge-leaves-indonesian-073216126.html

            • reante says:

              dog the plandemic demand destruction was 30pc.

              The supply destruction now is not 25pc.

              There are not going to be any lockdowns because this is not a plandemic. It’s the hammer-meet-nail wrong terminology to be using. Rationing is the word you’re looking for.

              Rationing is the last resort supply side management protocol for peak oil Collapse: conservation. Kulm is discounting the fact that rationing is going to go an awful long way to evening the playing field between rich and poor, and that’s just the beginning of it. The rich are entering a living hell.

              Fake 30pc plandemic lockdowns for 1.5 years was the penultimate, demand side management protocol that bought another 5 years until the rationing: conservation by other means.

            • Itrustmydog says:

              Reante. 30 percent at peak. 9.7 percent across all of 2020.

              https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/horizons-of-oil-era-in-light-of-the-covid-19-crisis/

              It could be rationing. That’s what we saw in 79 and ww2. A lockdown defines how oil is used. Rationing limits consumption but how the oil is used is still up to the one trading money for it. High prices are another means. Economic destruction where people have no money is another. The fifth possibility is unobtanium. Sold out. This is the possibility most contrary to order.

              It’s rather academic. Either which way we have never seen anything like this.

              Regardless it’s going to be a dramatic involuntary means to reduce oil consumption. Money will no longer represent means to consume energy infinitely.

              No the 25 percent reduction in supply is not here yet because of strategic reserves and boat times. That’s why consumption limiting measures are not in place just yet

              Which way it goes is a dice throw. IMO the best models are also supply reduction causal not financial or economic. I don’t have a lot of confidence in any previous model.

            • reante says:

              dog thanks for the correction, let me rephrase that: over the five years following the start of the plandemic, the plandemic artificially destroyed 30pc of the pre- plandemic annual demand for the equivalent of 1.5 years of that demand. That cumulative destruction is why I’m apparently the only one to still insist that peak oil happened in 2018, because that cumulative demand destruction on the fitted Hubbert Curve runs negative from that 2018 peak. Why I’m apparently the last man standing on that, I have no idea because it’s a simple truth.

              “A lockdown defines how oil is used. Rationing limits consumption but how the oil is used is still up to the one trading money for it.”

              No way dude. An intelligent rationing system is always going to triage based on systemic importance, and I challenge you to find me an intelligent rationing system in all of human history. Even in the 70s when hard rationing wasn’t required, the soft-rationing odd-even days for consumers was something that industry and commercial transportation was never subject to. Calling it lockdowns is just the politicization of rationing.

            • reante says:

              dog that should read: I challenge you to find me an UNintelligent rationing system

        • runawaywise3f07697399 says:

          Reante, the 2 buckets thing is the way we farm now. We grew produce for restaurants back in NY for 17 years on a medium scale. Here in Maine we focus on improving soil. Lots of good things to say about coastal Maine but the soil sucks. 45th parallel, cold winters still, ocean moderated temps. We move seaweed, manure, wood chips compost etc in 5 gallon buckets. This kind of growing doesn’t lend itself to equipment larger than a wheelbarrel.

          • In terms of the (filled up)buckets moving / work-flow is it all manual-foot work still, or do you use some basic cargo hauling contraptions like say motorized wheelbarrow or cart behind 2wheel mini tractor etc ?

            • runawaywise3f07697399 says:

              We use a cart behind a lawn tractor when we are watering new perennials. 5 gallon buckets of water are just too heavy. Using the buckets kind of helps with the 3/1 compost mix which we are working on. Recently switched from wood chips from road crews and tree service companies to the chips made by firewood companies.

              Sorry Gail, don’t mean to turn this into the New Farmers Forum at Rodale from 15 years ago.

            • Yes I also ponnied up for more cleaner wood mulch sort in recent yrs, especially for potting the outer layer ( near / around ) root balls.

              That cheaper = bark ~infested wood mulch sort applied then only above the terrain doesn’t harm as much in terms of leaching down-sidewayz..

          • reante says:

            Thanks runaway! That’s a beautiful way to farm. Explains why the BCS — which in America, Jr, is synonymous with rototiller — has been parked. We’re also at the 45th parallel. Seaweed is a really wonderful resource to have, congratulations. I put up my PTO chipper for sale. Not what i intend to use my remaining diesel in the tank on. Got plenty of rotting hugelwood laying around.

        • Art showing throughput for ” Bab el Mandeb ” – which dropped to ~1/2 from late 2010s; and freefall to ~1/3 measured from the post ukro war ~2022 LNG spiked traffic levels after the Iran thing..

          So, that’s perhaps even over-generous way optimistic scenario to begin with..

          PS mind you – also ” partially ” explained by planned higher throughput for cross-desert pipelines bypassing this chokepoint..

          • “” partially ” explained by planned higher throughput for cross-desert pipelines bypassing this chokepoint..

            So others saw the problem, and figured out a way to work around it.

            Perhaps this can happen with Hormuz, at least to some extent. Others always have their eyes open and are adapting. This is what makes judging from past patterns so often misleading.

        • That is quite the chart, showing a drop of what looks to me like two-thirds of traffic through the Bab-el-Mandeb Straight, after the Houthi attacks! Traffic never rebounded at all.

          Art says:

          The Red Sea never normalized after 2023 Houthi attacks.

          Despite months of U.S. naval operations, shipping traffic is 50% of pre-disruption levels

          Why should Hormuz be different?

          This is our most likely oil and LNG future

          Time to get real honest about what this means.

      • x-soviet says:

        Properly implemented rationing is also a very efficient tool of total population control and fine-grained intelligence (on the same stupid sheeple – who consumes how much and when).
        Together with demonstrative, public persecution of “blackmarketers” it improves and solidifies the new/improved PTB reign.

    • A point the article makes:

      For Pakistan, Egypt, parts of Africa, Southeast Asia, and import-dependent economies in Latin America, $105 Brent combined with currency weakness can feel more like $130–150 oil did in earlier cycles. Markets increasingly appear to recognize that demand destruction arrives before absolute physical exhaustion. The first participants forced out of the market are not wealthy American consumers. They are fertilizer buyers in Africa, trucking firms in Pakistan, factories in Bangladesh, and households across import-dependent economies.

      This is why the prices in markets in richer countries are not spiking to high levels. The demand in poor countries is falling because of the prices right now.

  37. Itrustmydog says:

    Re motor oil stashing. I still have my stash from Mike Adams claiming lubricants we’re going away during COVID. What has been out for months? The inexpensive super tech oil filters I like.

  38. Francesco Meneguzzo says:

    Dear Gail, enlightening as and more than usual, thank you. In the medium/long term, things always go on forced by physical constraints, not by opinions.
    An issue for our “beautiful garden” aka Europe is that in the deep of our soul is fascism, willingly or not the highest political construct of modern times in the intermediate world between Americas and the Russia-China block, practically no one excluded in continental western/eastern Europe. A snap of the fingers and it will dominate again with 80% consensus as it was; and war – long overdue and subliminally desidered by most – will again engulf Europe as soon as US will leave, which will happen, comsuming all the residual resources in a meat grinder of biblical proportions. Thus, I fear your 100-years prediction will come true, before some kind of stabilization at a far lower living standard (if any) will be established.

    • Thanks for your thoughts. Political systems can be expected to keep changing. I am afraid I am not an expert on which ones will last. Overly expensive or overly generous (in terms of payouts for pensions, for example) cannot last indefinitely, if resources are down. Top-level governmental structures (NATO and EU for example are in danger of failing early on.

  39. edpell3 says:

    The location of the Ashkenazi rulers of the Americas is correctly shown in yellow. The Ashkenazi rulers of ROW is not shown.

    • Where would you put them? Will they really be the rulers, long term?

    • WIT82 says:

      While some Jewish individuals may be part of the ruling class, claiming that “the Jews” rule the world is simply intellectual laziness. The reality is far more complex.

      • n2k49 says:

        Replace Jews with “Capitalists”, “white people” or “men” and most people on the Left would wholeheartedly agree that those groups of people rule the world.

        Very few people would deny that Abrahamic religions don’t dominate the world. All Abrahamic religions were founded and spread by Jews. Perhaps, this is where the impression that the world is under Jewish leadership comes from. If empires for the two thousands years spread some variation of Hinduism or Shintoism people would be saying similar things about Hinduism or Shintoism especially if was universally taboo to object to the beliefs of Hinduism or Shintoism in public.

        • WIT82 says:

          I worry that issues like antisemitism, homophobia, and racism might be used as distractions from the real problem of oil depletion. It’s much easier for people to blame “others” for complex challenges that are hard for the general public to grasp. Quick 30-second soundbites are far more digestible for voters than nuanced topics like peak oil.

          • been banging on for years now—-we do not have a political problem, we have an energy problem.

            yet idiots still vote as if politics can alter our ultimate destiny

            • n2k49 says:

              Politics determine who gets the lion’s share of what is available. If you are a rent-seeker who has access to society that allows you to rent seek, you may thrive while others barely survive.

              That is politics.

  40. Jan says:

    Very interesting considerations!

    The actual energy consumption also includes the energy content of goods and their transports. A service economy that imports aluminum, cement, fertilizers, glass and solar cells must include the energy necessary for the production and transport of these basic materials if it wants to unbundle its economy. The energy required for these products must then be applied by themselves.

    Therefore, if we want to compare per capita consumption, we need to look not only at oil consumption, but also at actual energy consumption, including the movement of goods. However, these energy flows are only collected very insufficiently, we do not have the data. As a result, it looks as if one side consumes little, while the other side shows not only the true energy costs, but also those of the other, supposedly more economical side.

    Assuming that we estimate the energy imported in the form of goods at 100% of the directly consumed energy, which is certainly too much, it would appear from Figure 7 and 8 that the Americas consume almost 150 exajoules and the ex-Americas 450. If the energy consumption including the import of goods is now twice that, then we have to subtract 150 from 450 exajoules. Both would consume the same amount with 300 exajoules.

    I realize that these are not the numbers, I want to show where the journey is going. It’s true, but even more complex.

    If Trump and Xi disentangle the economic areas, then the Americas will have to produce more and the non-Americas less.

    It must also be taken into account that the Americas are home to about 1 billion people, and the non-Americas consume 7.25 billion per capita, so the non-Americas consume significantly less.

    Assuming that the Americas now produce their energy-intensive goods themselves, and the Asians manage to sell the goods produced for the Americas on their own markets, then the unbundling will increase global energy consumption instead of reducing it. So the opposite of the negotiation goal would come out.

    If we don’t want that, then instead of selling insurance, AI and vaccinations, the Americas will have to produce more shoes, aluminum and cement. The non-Americas would have to produce less shoes, aluminum and cement and more insurance, AI and vaccinations. These are lengthy and very complex changes. The question arises whether we have this time in view of the Hormuz lockdown. The Chinese have supplies for 90 days. We are the 75th day in the war.

    • Thanks for your thoughts. I agree that there is a lot of embedded energy in the things we import. The embedded energy is generally coal, or perhaps natural gas, at low cost. There is likely a lot of it.

      I am figuring that population will have to decline in both parts of the world. Standards of living will also decline. We won’t produce nearly as much goods as we do now, in either of the trade regions. The Americas may ramp up energy production a little, and the Americas may keep more of what we produce for ourselves. in making graphs, I discovered that the US is a net exporter of coal and of natural gas. I am sure it is a net exporter of natural gas liquids, as well.

      It is hard for me to believe that total global energy consumption will grow, unless we figure out something truly new. In theory, efficiency could also help total production of end products.

    • guest says:

      Sounds like a lot of services are scams. Insurers generally try get out of their obligations to pay out claims when a claim is filed and it is legitimite…A.I. is actually people pretending to be machines in India…. and vaccinations don’t always work as intended .

  41. (1) The areas of influence in Fig 1 are too large as oil supplies will shrink
    (2) US crude production is too light to yield much diesel. That is one of the reasons why we have a global diesel crisis. And now the crude in the Middle East which makes diesel is blocked in Hormuz for the foreseeable future
    (3) Up to now nothing good came out of what Trump did
    (4) I have analyzed Australia’s situation (at the end of the world and dependent on fuel imports from hard-hit Asia) in several articles:

    12 May 2026
    Floating offshore diesel storage in Australian EEZ
    https://crudeoilpeak.info/floating-offshore-diesel-storage-in-australian-eez

    7/5/2026
    Australia needs a higher number of tankers to meet fuel import requirements
    https://crudeoilpeak.info/australia-needs-a-higher-number-of-tankers-to-meet-fuel-import-requirements

    30/4/2026
    Australia’s 5th Dimension in securing diesel supplies
    https://crudeoilpeak.info/australias-5th-dimension-in-securing-diesel-supplies

    • reante says:

      “(3) Up to now nothing good came out of what Trump did”

      Nothing tangible anyway. Nothing material. Yet. But given the Collapse context we also have to be realistic about what the definition of good is is because Collapse isn’t a normatively good context.

      Ten there are the intangibles – the intangible progress, if any, made out of what Trump did. That’s the meta-analysis of the situation, and certainly still up for debate though you know where I stand on it.

    • Here I am talking about the Americas, not the United States. While US oil production is very light, there is a lot of heavy oil being piped into the US from Canada. The oil we get from Mexico is fairly heavy, and certainly the oil from Venezuela is. With the various sources to mix together, I didn’t think that the light/heavy discussion was necessary.

      Regarding your links, it looks like Australia is quite well supplied with oil, so far.

      I corresponded with someone from New Zealand. He said that Singapore was sending them refined products, so they were doing OK, if I understood correctly.

    • adonis says:

      So they have secured the oil but until it arrives at our ports it doesnt exist so mad max could be just around the corner for Australia that so called ‘lucky country’ i wonder how many days onshore storage is left that would be the true indicator of our situation.

  42. Demiurge says:

    Israel needs more troops to join ‘immediately’ amid ‘collapsing’ army

    https://www.trtworld.com/article/97606a6f3b19

    ===============================

    Israel struggles to counter Hezbollah’s sophisticated fibre-optic drones — report

    https://www.trtworld.com/article/4ebbffde5d9f

    ==============================

    Is Israel overreaching itself? It has all those fronts to defend.

    Will the US continue to provide massive amounts to fund Israel’s wars?

    • According to the first article, Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir wants to change the conscription law to include the ultra orthodox Jews. He also wants to extend the mandatory length of service to 36 months.

      Netanyahu needs the support of the ultra orthodox Jews. I doubt that they would support such a law. The situation is beginning to sound like Ukraine. Find every able-bodied citizen it can to draft.

      Yes, Israel is overreaching. Without a bigger country helping, it can’t do very well.

      We will find out whether the US will continue to provide massive amounts to fund Israel’s wars.

  43. ivanislav says:

    >> In the video, One Country Quietly Won this War

    Gail, I am afraid you are referencing an AI video. This isn’t real. You can tell in a few ways: (1) more bloviation than humans typically engage in. “Today I am going to tell you what no one else is noticing” … a little while later, the same thing, paraphrased. (2) Weird quirks in voice and tone. A brief and slight British accent. “ehh” at the end of a sentence before sharply cut off. (3) Many channels will have the same speaker in a very limited number of outfits or with precisely the same camera shot; clothing will occupy precisely the same dimensions and with the same wrinkles.

    All of this takes more attention and inspection than we are used to giving videos.

    • guest says:

      And how is A.I. content any more reliable than misleading content presented by humans?

      In terms of computer generated content, the masses tend to be far more accepting of A.I. than people who visit this blog. Being skeptical of A.I. seems to be a class signifier more than anything.

      • ivanislav says:

        >> how is A.I. content any more reliable than misleading content presented by humans

        Marandi has direct contacts with people high in Iranian government, society, and military. This AI bot has none of that. There is an *enormous* difference between the two with respect to reliability of information regarding just about anything concerning Iran. I’m curious how or why you would equate the two?

    • Perhaps, but the video makes reasonable points. If Dr. Marandi did not make it himself, I am guessing that a student of Dr. Marandi made it to emphasize the points he would make.

      I understand that in New Testament days, it was very common for followers of a particular leader or Rabbi to write what are now books of the Bible, under the name of a person they admired. As a consultant, I often ghost-wrote proposed testimony for relatively higher-up people in the organization. From time to time, I get advertisements from people who want to help me to get my ideas out to a wider audience.

      Exactly where do you draw the line? Textbooks are always second, third, of fourth-hand information.

      • Itrustmydog says:

        Gaiil I think there are issues here. What if a video of you was to be created saying things you may or may not agree with? That is certainly not Marandi.its really amazing. Ritter and Meashiemer are two others who have 100s of fake AI videos with things they did not say. I actually liked the content of one before I caught on. Certainly a deal brokered by China would be a fantastically desirable outcome. I appreciate your hope for a desirable outcome.

        Ritter commented in depth on this recently. He mentioned he is not doing it for money but he has to eat. Clicks are money. One single video had more clicks than his most clicked video. Now multiply it by a hundred. The motive is profit. Give the people what they want is profit. That’s exactly what AI is doing. Whether it’s AI saying gold will go to $100000 or other things people would like to happen it’s giving people what they want. It’s like producing two paids subscription to a investment newsletter one bull and one bear. The product is tailored to emotional preference. All that matters is someone buys the nesletter. If you arnt right with one you are with the other Only with ai doing it it’s not binary it’s a vast array of tailoring words that some portion of the population ‘likes” . Why not? It takes seconds. If they don’t like it the person impersonated takes the fall not the mystery creator.

        People like desirable outcomes.

        Ai could never be you Gail. Not in a million years. They could fake you. They might find some interesting variations. AI actually can evolve ideas. It’s amazing. But AI could never be you.

        • Tim Groves says:

          When it comes to AI videos, you can’t beat Koko-nyan, the laughing cat who is always short of cash and willing to take on new side jobs. You can spend hours watching this kind of thing and get a pretty good introduction to life in contemporary Tokyo. So I rate it less of a waste of time than viewing AI videos about the latest goings on in Ukraine, Iran, Israel, etc.

      • ivanislav says:

        >> I am guessing that a student of Dr. Marandi made it to emphasize the points he would make

        This is a stretch. What is more likely, I believe, is that someone just wanted to make youtube advertising money and that is why all these avatar channels are popping up for well-known pundits.

        • I looked at the transcript of the talk. I didn’t look at more than a couple minutes of the video itself. As I recall, the transcript sounded a little more like a paper Marani had written, and was reading to an audience, rather than an impromptu talk, filled with a lot of Um’s, Ah’s and repeated words. But I was fine with that.

          If anyone wants to, they can listen to a version of my post by clicking the link at the top of the post. The voice is not me; it is “Beth,” with an American English accent.

          In today’s world, I would not be surprised if you can make a video of yourself giving a talk without actually giving such a talk. I know that one of my cousin made a video that brought together mostly short video clips, created by different cousins. (I think we were supposed to say Happy Birthday to a mutual cousin.) One of the clips included an AI version of someone who was not available.

  44. guest says:

    The African birth rate is ,allegedly, declining 1 percent every year.

    https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/afr/africa/birth-rate

    This doesn’t seem much because they are declining from a higher starting point than most areas in the world. but looked at over a ten year plus period, it is striking.

  45. Hubbs says:

    I can see why you left the last thread open for so long, Gail. The reality is that we are in a lull, a “dead zone” until the US November midterms, the Russian-Ukraine War, the US-Israel-Iran war, the US monetary and fiscal impending storm, the food /agricultural situation over the next few months all play out.

    It is almost futile to listen to /watch all these crisis pumpers on You Tube and other blogs.

    • guest says:

      It is futile to listen/ watch any influencer on the internet. Most of it is designed for maximum engagement and nothing else.

    • Electricity doesn’t pave roads. This is a photo I took when visiting India in 2012.

      https://ourfiniteworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/men-repairing-road.jpg

      The setting was not very far from Mumbai.

    • In the US, there is a whole lot of road paving and parking lot repairs that could be done. I expect that budgets are not high enough to do much of it, however.

      • guest says:

        A lot of roads in the earliest cities in America and Europe were made from rocks. I wonder if we could go back to that with automobiles and our population size.

        • Itrustmydog says:

          There were main streets in major cities up until 90 or so as I remember. But it wasnt just cobble from a quarry. They were pretty flat . I think they had been worked somehow. They were also fitted with craftsmanship. Cobble has advantages over concrete. The space in between the rocks forms expansion joints for temperature extremes. They seemed to last “forever” .

          • Yes, more precise identification of the subject would be helpful; basically there were many stages and approaches: historically cobble stones ( as per city centers and major artery routes ), then there were also gravel segments in it either for quick repair or repeated water damage sections etc., and then when came asphalt it was also used in various mixes with gravel – depending on the importance of such road, so again you had smooth out top layered asphalt for major arteries but most of the secondary, tertiary roads were rough gravel-asphalt mix only, and the rest nothing aka “Agricultural / Service / Farm / Forrest..” roads..

            In terms of carz, well the speeds traveled on such road infrastructure was way smaller. The tire tech was evolving also hence repairs – tire change overs taken place way more freq. per traveled distance then now, e.g. even regular bus lines used to have them attached say pre WWII era / pre concrete highway system times and so on..

            It’s very important topic though.
            Because it’s not just about tires but the whole transportation mode choices at hand. For example only certain bike frames allow for the truly offroady tires, similarly there is no point having legacy car with insufficient ground clearance for the times of the future ( gravel, potholes , .. ).

            And if we revert back into animal draft again ( even partially and slowly ), the entire ~industry for it had to be brought back, here pic of the metal outward ring:
            https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellmacherei

        • have you actually driven on a road made from rocks?

          (eyerolling time)

          • guest says:

            Have you ever driven a vehicle designed to drive over cobblestone or rocks?

            • —yes i have actually—a road roller….—and i dont mean ”just to see if i could”, but to actually prepare surfaces…part of my misspent youth…

              but an everyday vehicle designed to use rocky tracks etc, is a contradiction in terms

    • Itrustmydog says:

      Modi refusing energy from Russia voluntarily certainly fits the trend. The basic standard of living that LPG represents make the decision that much more amazing.

      I note that was done after the election. Some things are universal.

    • raviuppal4 says:

      Update . I have long advocated India as a standard case of collapse . So the situation is getting worse from bad .
      1 . Planning commision asks for a ban on all govt construction for two years . Broke , broke .
      https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/top-headlines/niti-calls-for-two-year-construction-ban-as-west-asia-crisis-drains-economy/
      2 . Today the govt increased the import duty on gold from 6% to 15 % . The whole gold jewellery sector is dead . 10 million jobs will vanish . It is a labour intensive business as the work is done by hand artisans . Gold jewellery is now unaffordable for the indian middle class .
      The Indian growth story was a myth all along . False data provided by the govt . Next will be capital controls .
      Oh , by the way — no LPG , no jet fuel , no urea , diesel shortages are now occuring in patches . Oil stocks maximum 45 days .

  46. Retired Librarian says:

    Hi Gail, the China connection might be good. Thanks for your interesting thoughts & the work you put into OFW.

    • I was waiting to have an idea for an article that was not just, “We are all going to die in a few weeks.”

      • guest says:

        The Olduvai theory does seem optimistic in retrospect.
        Fast Eddy might have had the right idea.
        Perhaps extinction is what will happen.

        ai search result:
        “Yes, radiation release from spent fuel pools is a significant concern during military actions against countries with nuclear power plants. Attacks on these facilities could potentially lead to catastrophic releases of radioactive material into the environment.”

        It looks like nuclear power could be weaponized but not in the way the U.S. media suggests nuclear power could be weaponized.

        • reante says:

          Industrial collapse is the bigger concern regarding nuclear power industry collapse than is war.

          Olduvai Theory isn’t optimistic, it just doesn’t go into enough detail to cover nuclear power industry collapse but the theory does feature permanent Blackouts which covers nuclear power industry collapse.

          But that’s what the DA is for.

          And Eddy is a pessimist because his pessimism gives him an excuse to be lazy and weak.

          • guest says:

            Fast Eddy was a prepper , last time I checked.
            He noted it was futile because he was not part of a large close knit group. Most people are lazy ( they do what is easiest.) and most people are not strong( we don’t kill unathletic people).

            • reante says:

              He used to be years ago is my understanding. But prepping isn’t caring and caring takes character and character isn’t what Eddy’s known for. Don’t have to be an athlete to be strong you just have to have heart.

            • Tim Groves says:

              Eddy has set himself up in Oz so that when the time comes, he can fulfill his lifelong ambition to become a real-life road warrior.

              I can see him and Holio now, sharing a tin of Dinki-Di dogfood.

            • Itrustmydog says:

              Family works somewhat as “group”. In the modern world with everybody entitled one way or another it does not work well.

              Non family groupings are even worse.

              Ex military is a group that has a shot.

              Other groups invariably fall into gang psychology structure. While it can exhibit resilience it is not sustainable.

              Industrial civilization has eliminated the practice of grouping in a manner that is sustainable. Tribal society.

              Tribal society allowed for relatively equal contributions and relatively equal benefits.

              All this assumes human behavior is the key to sustainable groupings. It is but only if the environment supports population levels.

              Resource distribution within the group is problematic for its continuence when tribal society is absent.

        • There seems to be a Hidden Hand that favors humans. Disasters tend to be local. I am doubtful that extinction will happen any time in the next 100 years.

          • guest says:

            You are assuming that we will be able to keep the spent fuel pools from releasing a significant amount of radiation. There is also a significant under-assessment of environmental degradation and a decline in pollution controls. Problems will pollution are largely hidden from those who live in affluent areas . The people living in affluent areas come to the conclusion that pollution problems don’t exist because they don’t see it. The whole Hand thing also has a religious aspect to it. For a while, the Earth favored large reptiles. That didn’t last forever.

      • Dianne Rose says:

        An honest laugh.

      • Dianne Rose says:

        Also, I would be interested if you incorporated space exploration in your (musings?)

        • there will be no space exploration.

          if a human leaves earth gravity for more than a week or few, when he returns he is unable to walk….

          if space exploration reaches, say, Mars (a 9 month trip)—when he gets there the same problem will occur, only more acute–but with no one there to assist —so the explorer will just sit there unable to move.

          beyond mars space trips will take years, travellers will be dead.

          and space exploration must have a profitable purpose—-sorry but there isnt one.

          also it is far too expensive for humankind to support—we can’t afford it.

          • raviuppal4 says:

            Time for ” pie in the sky ” BS stopped . The not OFW’rs are dancing while the Titanic is sinking .

          • Tim Groves says:

            It’s the final frontier, innit?

          • Serious ” space exploration ” w. people on board means some sort of artificial gravity provided for the passengers. That has been theoretically established forewarned / pre-gamed like a century ago..

            Tech. speaking, most likely in some spinning concept around the axle to achieve it. That’s not a problem vs. getting the mass ( components of the structure ) into orbit – an array of space elevators likely needed for such large ship projects. And obviously there must be some sorts NPP on board not only for the propulsion, and providing the habitat ( incl. greenhouses and fishtanks, .. ) BUT also some permanently switched on active repulsive radiation shield, which would likely suck most of the e-juice.

            Technically all doable.
            The key Q: though is it worth it and Why: when already soiling ( terraforming already?) ” their own ” planet badly in the first place..

            • there was an ofw nut who advocated space elevators—havent seen him for years, i think he bought a one way ticket on one.

            • Given the advance in material science, it is possible these elevators could eventually appear in few decades..
              If I recall it correctly and low earth orbit starts at ~mere alt. of 200km that’s not impossible spool of some composite ” wire ” to begin with. Most likely such system would materialize in some hybrid form as attached rocketry modules from higher attitude temporarily descending/ascending to it for steering and position correction..

            • Tim Groves says:

              I predict we will not have a working space elevator within Norman’s lifetime.

              By the way, I get vertigo just looking at the computer graphics version of this thing.

            • guest says:

              Not technically doable because nothing has been built or even close to be built. I think you meant theoretically possible.

  47. maxinerogers says:

    Hi Gail,
    I have been thinking that the smartest thing to do, when something becomes scarce, is not try and get more of it but to learn to do without it.

    • water and oil—-hmmmm—i must bear that in mind

    • Unfortunately, it is really difficult to do without food and fresh water. But meat tends to take a whole lot more energy than grains, and locally grown food can be more available than that brought from a distance. We all need to be planting gardens.

      • Jan says:

        It is much more difficult to get food from gardens in unsuited areas than from animals. A garden requires water and soil and often soil or rock movement. A sheep or cattle only needs some grass and shrubs. A ren or caribou can also be held in very difficult conditions where gardening would require glasshouses, artificial light and heating. You are right talking about soy-fed mass production of meat or lab grown meat. You are wrong if you think about keeping some hens in the backyard.

    • x-soviet says:

      Molecular oxygen?

    • Itrustmydog says:

      Like oxygen? 🙂 yes if it’s caviar that works. Doing without is a very healthy coping strategy IMO. Mostly. Less chance of someone sticking a gun up your nose. That’s the trouble with having nice things. It only is desirable while there is order. In chaos sourcing directly from environment and little owning has advantages.

      I always found Farley Mowats explanation of owning in the northern Canadian tribes very interesting. If someone had something they used they owned it. If they had two someone just started using it. It became theirs.

      The Soviet Union found the ideas interesting also. It resulted in them providing a all expense paid trip to the northern tribes in Siberia for Farley and his book Sibir. And most probably Farleys inability source a USA visa after.

      Those northern Canadian tribes didn’t create shelter until snow fell. Can you imagine? The did create exquisite and durable equivalents to insulated coveralls made of fur taking advantage of 75 percent of food ingested wasted as heat. The years where the caribou didn’t go through were problematic.

      What I wonder about old times? What happened when a tooth went? You just hang with that pain? Seriously? Or find a brown bear and slap it?

      • Itrustmydog says:

        The term AI is certainly over used. In regards to military drones the frontier is vision engines. Mechanical identification of a target. As it turns out this takes a lot of cloud capacity and stored video of human operators final approaches to targets. These are used to teach the machine vision engines. Right now this is focusing on the final targeting part of the flight for two reasons. This is when jamming boccurs, novice operators often miss. Machine vision engines are not as good as the best human operators but are much better than novices.

        Drone warfare is in constant development. Russia was ahead for a bit with the introduction of fiber optic targeting. It appears Ukraine is very much ahead in regard to machine intelligence. The battlefield is actively part of the development process.

        Irans destroying all the THAAD radars in the middle east was profoundly destabilizing. It signalled the end of air defense as we know it. At the same time the Ukraine war is ignored. Russian air defense is deeply penetrated weekly. I would argue this is even more destabilizing. These are deep penetration s into the nation with possibly the greatest nuclear capability in the world.
        While I consider the energy situation the gravest threat to industrial civilization pouring resources into war zones for the new age of inexpensive precision weapons seems not to raise any attention as all eyes are on Iran. . Russias missile programs have yielded impressive capabilities. They too fall by the wayside somewhat as the age of ai increases every day..

        https://youtu.be/vNuesh9fxhc?si=Csaev707m-Lme-1z

Leave a Reply